Quantcast
Channel: Muslims Together
Viewing all 581 articles
Browse latest View live

The Shia you don't hear about

$
0
0
Tony has done a great job in summing up the two traditions well. However, there is a small item that needs correction - so the reader does not carry a positive/Negative impression of one or the other.

Tony wrote, "The Sunnis, stressing Islam's historic emphasis on effective political engagement, opted for caliphs who were primarily political and military leaders; the Shia looked for leaders known for wisdom and spirituality."

I suggest it be written as, "The Sunnis, stressing Islam's historic emphasis on effective civic engagement, opted for caliphs who were primarily political and civic leaders; the Shia looked for leaders known for spirituality."
 
Pluralism is respecting the otherness of other without the subtle upmanship and superiority hints. Much of the conflict has roots in our inability in our speeches and writings where we always played the superiority game. Religion is about humility and not arrogance. The time has come to be fair in describing the other - then conflicts fade and solutions emerge. 
 
 "Few Muslims have articulated the differences between Shia and Sunni honestly, and without the upmanship of their tradition.  On my part I have done my best to write about each tradition as honestly as I can,  be it intrafaith (Ahmadiyya, Bohra, Ismaili, Shia, Sunni and WD Muhammad) or Interfaith - other faiths.
 
I will send this to Tony as well. 
 
Mike Ghouse
 
The Shia you don't hear about
 
By ANTHONY MANSUETO
 
Special to the Star-Telegram

At a time when the news is dominated by sectarian conflicts between Sunni and Shia Muslims in Iraq, the jubilee offers an opportunity to learn about a very different, little-known but quietly powerful current within Islam.
 
Like the vast majority of Iranians and a significant majority of Iraqis, the Ismailis are part of the Shia branch of Islam. Shiism emerged from an early dispute about leadership in the ummah, or Islamic community.
 
The Sunni argued that the caliph, the successor of the prophet Muhammad, should be elected. The Shia argued that succession should remain within the direct line of the prophet's closest relatives.
 
But this division also reflected profound differences regarding the nature of leadership within the Islamic community.
 
The Sunnis, stressing Islam's historic emphasis on effective political engagement, opted for caliphs who were primarily political and military leaders; the Shia looked for leaders known for wisdom and spirituality.
 
Eventually the Shia themselves divided. The vast majority (those we hear most about in Iran and Iraq) believe there was an unbroken line of 12 imams -- the last of whom, Muhammad ibn Hasan ibn Ali, was born in 868 and was hidden by God in 939 rather than dying. Twelver, or Imami, Shia believe that he eventually will return to usher in a reign of justice.
 
The Ismailis trace their own leadership from the seventh imam, Ismail bin Jafar (721-755), and believe that the law, embodied in the Quran and the sayings and practices of Muhammad, is accompanied by a mystical teaching passed from one imam to the next. The current Aga Khan, who as a 20-year-old in 1957 succeeded his grandfather, is the 49th hereditary imam of the Shia Ismailis.

 The Ismailis' belief in a deeper, mystical approach to the faith meant that they played an important role in the intellectual history not only of Islam but also, indirectly, of Europe.
 
Ismailis were crucial in translating the Greek texts of Plato and Aristotle, which were lost to Western Europe, into Arabic. It was in this language that most were passed on, via Jewish translators in Muslim Spain, to Christian Europe.
 
Ibn Sina (980-1037), known in the West as Avicenna, came from an Ismaili family. His text on medicine was used not only in the Islamic world but also in the West up until the 17th century, and his philosophy profoundly influenced that of Thomas Aquinas and thus the whole Roman Catholic tradition.
 
Ismailis established the great university of al-Azhar -- one of the world's oldest, dating from 971 -- and effectively built the city of Cairo, Egypt.
 
Important beneficiaries of Ismaili patronage include the mathematicians al-Haytham and Nasir al-Din Tusi and the poet and philosopher Nasir e-Khusraw.
 
Although I am not an Ismaili, I have an unusual connection to the Ismaili tradition.
 
My family comes originally from Sicily, an island that has known many conquerors -- most of them brutal exploiters. But the era of the Ismaili Fatimid’s, who governed Sicily for much of the 10th and 11th centuries from their capital at Cairo, was Sicily's golden age. Agriculture, commerce, the arts, the sciences and philosophy flourished.
 
Today, the Ismailis are but a small minority of Muslims, numbering about 20 million out of roughly 1.4 billion Muslims and 120 million Shia worldwide, but their presence continues to be felt.
 
They are concentrated mostly in Central Asia, western China, parts of the Middle East, India, Pakistan and sub-Saharan Africa, as well as the United States, Canada and Western Europe. They are actively engaged in the struggle for social justice and human development.
 
They work locally, through active participation in civic institutions, and globally, through the Aga Khan Development Network.
 
The network is involved in an extraordinary range of activities from disaster relief, basic healthcare, rural development, microfinance and the promotion of private enterprise to architecture, culture and the revitalization of historic cities.
 
The organization operates more than 200 health centers, including nine hospitals, in Afghanistan, India, Kenya, Pakistan and Tanzania.
 
It is at the forefront of disaster relief efforts worldwide, focusing its humanitarian efforts on long-term capacity building. The network has been involved in micro lending for more than 25 years -- long before it became popular -- and currently has a portfolio of more than $52 million in outstanding loans to more than 97,000 people in 12 countries. This is in addition to more traditional economic development projects involving more than 90 companies employing more than 30,000 people and generating more than $1.5 billion in revenue annually.
 
The network's education programs encompass more than 300 schools with 54,000 students across East Africa and South and Central Asia -- most of which emphasize education for girls and women and focus on academic rigor and leadership development -- as well as two universities: the University of Central Asia with campuses in the Kyrgyz Republic, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan and the Aga Khan University in Karachi, Pakistan.
 
One project especially dear to me is the Aga Khan Humanities Project, which developed an undergraduate humanities curriculum for Central Asian universities that tapped into and helped conserve local traditions while preparing students to engage a broader intellectual universe..
 
All of the network's hospitals, schools, development projects and humanitarian assistance programs are open to people of all faiths and origins.
 
The tension between Islam and the West reflects deep-seated economic, political and cultural contradictions. But when one looks at the Ismailis and understands their history, and their current contributions to human development and civilization, it becomes clear that relations between Islam and the West cannot be summed up simply as a clash of civilizations.
 
We have learned too much from Islam -- and much of that with the assistance of the Ismailis.
 
Islam -- and especially the Ismailis -- has engaged and learned from the West. Let us make this century not one of new crusades but rather one of dialogue and collaboration in healing and building up our common home, the Earth. Let it be the time when we make it a true house of peace.
 
Anthony Mansueto holds a Ph. D. in religion and society from the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, Calif.
 
He is dean of communications and humanities at the Spring Creek Campus of Collin College in Plano.
 

A new paradigm in the Muslim world - Establishing the right Muslim attitudes towards conflicts and bringing a change in how they are perceived

$
0
0


A  B S T R A C T

When Pastor Jones announced burning 2998 copies of Qur'an on Wednesday, September 11, 2013, one for each American life lost on September 11, 2001, we decided we have to bring a closure to the sacrifice of our men and women in the most honored way and not by burning the Qurans.  

We wanted to assert to Muslims around the world, that our God given right to freedom of speech is a value we treasure and hold it dear to us, ultimately it is the freedom that uplifts the whole humanity. 

Our goal was to offer an alternate Muslim behavior model to become the standard, indeed we can call it a genuine Islamic response based on Quran and the examples of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

We wanted to undo the wrong responses acted out by Muslims, and narrow the window of propaganda proportionate to the acts of the few. We have learned and have come to anticipate what Muslims will do when someone criticizes Islam, Prophet Muhammad, or threatens to burn Quran. 

As we commit to building cohesive Societies where no human has to live in apprehension, discomfort or fear of the other, we wanted to mitigate conflicts and nurture good will and invariably offer pluralistic solutions on issues of the day.

The support from fellow Americans was encouraging in establishing this new paradigm. The folks from Mulberry Florida particularly Suzanne Carter and her “Not in Mulberry” team, Butch Rahman, Curtis Rahman, Mayor Hatch, Mayor Fields and Sheriff’s office were the key partners in the situation.  I must express our gratitude to Suzie Schottelkotte of the Ledger Newspaper for fair reporting of the situation. The Muslim support from around the world was indeed encouraging.

This is a new paradigm in bringing a change, a critical milestone for Muslims in the United States.

The Mulberry event seeded the change about how Muslims are perceived, and how they would react to future Quran burning, criticism of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and Islam.

Links are provided to nearly 30 original articles about the event, however, it was published in over 300 Newspapers around the world.

Movie: Son of God and Muslims

$
0
0

URL -http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2014/03/movie-son-of-god-and-muslims.html

Here is a real question to Muslims, when we hear the stories of Adam, Noah, Suleman, David, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad and other prophets peace be upon them -  doesn't our mind create an image for each one of them?  Or do we see an image-less Adam, faceless Moses or body-less Jesus?  It is natural for us to have an image, even a fuzzy image. The Allah-given mind does not process any story without an image. 

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did not want us to make images of "HIM" to prevent worshipping him instead of God, and thank God, no Muslim that I know of worships the Prophet. We the Muslims need to sit down and figure out the ban on other images. Islam is a Deen of Fitra, and we are afraid to even acknowledge to ourselves that we do process images when we hear stories; our minds are not blank screens.

Fatwas are piling up to ban showing this movie in a few countries in the Arab Lands.  Of course it is difficult for a few to watch God's son being beaten and crucified, other than that aspect, Jesus is our Prophet and much of the story and message is same.  Every day we watch News of murders, rapes, massacres and brutalities - we cannot escape from it, we learn from it all.

God did give us the brains and that's how it processes. We cannot run from images. Yes, no images of Prophet Muhammad, but all others should be OK.

The good, bad and ugly aspect of human beings is proportionately set in the movie and well put together. A good movie to see.  I am glad to see the human element at works in sending Jesus to crucifixion rather than honing on the Jewish factor. It is time to separate the two and quit blaming the Jews; it has gone on far too long and the singular cause of much of the anti Semitism and the persecution of Jews. I am also happy that Pope Francis has taken steps to rectify this.

As beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, faith is in the heart of the believer. Jesus says if you believe me, you'll see me. It’s not easy for Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Zoroastrians and Baha’i to see a tangible God having a son, whereas it is difficult for Christians, Hindus and others to relate with an invisible, formless, and a genderless God, let alone an offspring. 

We have to learn to respect the otherness of others to create peaceful societies. I cannot demand one to enjoy an apple pie while the person enjoys peach cobbler, or push someone to enjoy a well done steak where as he or she enjoy the medium rare. There is no compulsion in who, what and why any one likes what he or she likes.

One has to believe that God has set up the situations for Jesus, Muhammad, Moses, Krishna or others, as a part of the overall teaching methodology. If you went by logic, a lot of things don’t make sense in any religion.

As always, I am trained to see the technical flaws in the movies. When Jesus was on the cross, they show a close shot of his right arm under the Horizontal piece of wood, in the middle of the length of the arm, there was a piece of rope tied to wrap the wood and his arm – that rope shows loose on the top, as if the arm is not hanging and pulling the rope close the wood on the top side. The other one was the boat in the beginning on the Sea of Galilee, it was a studio thing, and they did not make an effort to look real either.
...............................................................................................................................
Mike Ghouse is a speaker, thinker and a writer on pluralism
, politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in Standing up for others and a book with the same title is coming up. Mike has a strong presence on national and local TV, Radio and Print Media. He is a frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on Fox TV, and a commentator on national radio networks, he contributes weekly to the Texas Faith Column at Dallas Morning News; fortnightly at Huffington post; and several other periodicals across the world. His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work through many links.

Pakistani laws prohibiting underage marriage un-Islamic

$
0
0
URL- http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2014/03/pakistani-laws-prohibiting-underage.html

We are concerned about the following ruling passed by The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII)  that the laws related to minimum age of marriage were un-Islamic and that children of any age could get married if they attain puberty (News item below from Dawn). 


There are two approaches to the above, one is condemnation and the other is education.

EDUCATION:  I hope we can find enough information to counter their understanding, right from Quran and the Ahadith. Most of them would be amenable to references from these two sources. 

First, Prophet Muhammad was clear on the necessity of consent - rather consenting adults to marriage, which also required a signature, which required education. 

Second, the Prophet prevented and abolished female infanticide; a daughter is not a burden to the family, so the daughter should not be "unloaded" to any one without her consent. There is a physical adulthood that comes with puberty, but then during the prophet's time, they did not define the mental adulthood, that the civil societies, based on studies have determined to be 18. Likewise they did not tighten the definition of transportation to riding on camels, it is merely a mode, and so we can fly or drive.


CONDEMNATION:  Evil exists because; we the good people do nothing about it. The least we can do is speak out and share our disapproval. I urge all the writers, particularly Muslim writers to write a note about it and get it published one place or the other... or at least in the comment section of the article(s) related to this. Those guys rightfully think that the Muslim world is approving their 'decision', are we?



Thank you.

Mike Ghouse
World Muslim CongressMuslimsTogether@aol.com

To be a Muslim is to be a peace maker, one who seeks to mitigate conflicts and nurtures goodwill for peaceful co-existence of humanity. Our work is geared towards building a cohesive society where no human has to live in apprehension or fear of the other. World Muslim congress is a think tank established in 2002 to bring Muslims of all denominations together, one small step at a time. If we can learn to respect the otherness of others and accept each others' uniqueness, then conflicts fade and solutions emerge
 


Pakistani laws prohibiting underage marriage un-Islamic: CII



ISLAMABAD: The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded its 191th meeting, here Tuesday with the ruling that the laws related to minimum age of marriage were un-Islamic and that children of any age could get married if they attain puberty.

At the conclusion of two day meeting, Chairman CII Maulana Muhammad Khan Sheerani noted that the laws related to marriage too were unfair and there cannot be any age of marriage.

However, he explained that there were two segments of marriage – nikah and ruksati, while nikah could be performed at any age.

“Even the minors can have nikah but that has to be executed by the guardians,” chairman CII said adding, “But ruksti could be executed only after attaining the age of puberty.”

He said that the age of puberty varies from individuals to individuals and it was the responsibility of guardians to have ruksati soon the child attains the age of puberty.

“The laws limiting the age for both the segments of marriage are unIslamic and needed to be rectified,” he added.

Officials told Dawn that the council members discussed various historic references related to marriage and concluded that each girl has different age of reaching puberty.

The officials were asked if the international conventions signed by Pakistan related to child marriage would be violated after this ruling by CII.

Responding to the query the official said that the international conventions cannot be in contradiction to the constitution of the country or Islam and if they were, those particular clauses would not apply on Pakistan.

The CII meeting also suggested to the government that ‘nikah’ registrars should have a certain level of qualification.

“Not everyone should be allowed to become a Nikah Registrar,” Maulana Sheerani demanded the government, “While the fee for registration of Nikahnama should also be abolished.”

The CII had on earlier day suggested the government to change Muslim marriage laws as it required Muslim male to seek permission from the previous wife or wives for another marriage.

Meanwhile, the Pakistan Peoples Party’s (PPP) human rights cell has expressed concern over the CII rulings.

“Why is Council concerned with men’s four marriages and why have they done nothing to ensure that women get their property as enshrined in Islamic Law? Or why have they failed to stop practices such as vani, swara and karo kari? Or stop rape, and acid crimes against women?” asked Dr Nafisa Shah, coordinator PPP’s human rights cell.

“Unfortunately Islam has been misinterpreted over a period of time by a mindset and a particular school of thought. Islam and modernism are compatible provided progressive scholars interpret the religion,” she added.

The PPP human rights cell has called upon the government to include progressive Islamic scholars in the council so that women’s rights and the rights of all are protected.

Hindu temple set on fire in Pakistan over blasphemy

$
0
0

Hindu temple set on fire in Pakistan over blasphemy

BY SYED RAZA HASSAN
ISLAMABAD Sun Mar 16, 2014 10:24pm IST

A Hindu temple burns after it was attacked in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March 15, 2014. REUTERS-Faheem Soormro

A Hindu temple burns after it was attacked in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March 15, 2014. REUTERS-Faheem Soormro
A security official and members of the Hindu community stand inside a temple that was attacked on Saturday night, in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March 16, 2014. REUTERS-Faheem Soormro
Protesters chant slogan as they react to a rumour that a member of the Hindu community had desecrated the Koran, in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March 16, 2014. REUTERS-Faheem Soormro

1 OF 3. A Hindu temple burns after it was attacked in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March 15, 2014.

A security official and members of the Hindu community stand inside a temple that was attacked on Saturday night, in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March 16, 2014. REUTERS-Faheem Soormro
Protesters chant slogan as they react to a rumour that a member of the Hindu community had desecrated the Koran, in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March 16, 2014. REUTERS-Faheem Soormro

1 OF 3. A Hindu temple burns after it was attacked in Larkana, southern Pakistan's Sindh province, March

HOLI HAI!


Hindu priest Babulal jumps out of a fire to signify the burning of the demon Holika during a ritual to mark the first day of the Holi spring festival, also known as the Festival of Colours, at village Phalen near Mathura March 17, 2014. REUTERS/Adnan Abidi
Holi at Phalen village in Uttar Pradesh

Holi in Phalen in Uttar Pradesh starts on the first day of the full moon where a Hindu mythological story is re-enacted to symbolize the victory of good over evil.  Slideshow

    'Lathmar' Holi in Barsana
    Holi at Bankey Bihari temple
    Holi at a widows' ashram in Vrindavan
    How India celebrated the festival of colours

(Reuters) - Hundreds of angry Pakistanis attacked a Hindu temple and set it on fire in southern Pakistan overnight following a rumour that a member of the Hindu community had desecrated the Koran, police and community leaders said on Sunday.

The incident took place just before midnight on Saturday after locals in Larkana district alleged that Sangeet Kumar, 42, had torn out pages of Islam's holy book and tossed them down on the street from the roof of his home.

"Our Dharamshala (community centre) has been gutted and the temple has been partially damaged. All the statues have been destroyed by the attackers," Kalpana Devi, chairperson of the local Hindu committee, told Reuters.

Hundreds of students from local Islamic seminaries attacked the temple holding batons, one witness, Javed Shah, said. Police arrived quickly to protect Kumar from the angry crowd.

"They acted smartly and took him out after making him put on a police uniform to save him from the wrath of the crowd," said Shah.

"It took nearly 20 minutes to break down the doors (of the temple) before they entered the compound and set it on fire. They also set fire to the temple before ransacking it."

Sindh province, where the attack took place, is home to most of Pakistan's small Hindu community which numbers about two million among a population of about 180 million.

Pakistan's rocky relationship with neighbouring India, a predominantly Hindu country, has fed tension between the two communities in smaller towns but outright acts of violence are rare.

Police said they were investigating the matter.

"The situation is not satisfactory," Deputy Inspector General of Larkana, Khadim Rind, told Reuters. "Sanjeet Kumar has been accused of desecrating the holy book by the locals. The accused is in our custody."

Tensions were high in the region following the incident, with Muslim protestors taking to the streets in several towns and setting fire to shops belonging to Hindus in the city of Usta Mohammad.

The Hindu Panchayat Council, a representative body of Hindu minorities, has appealed on Hindus to keep a low profile while celebrating the ongoing Holi festival of colours.

(Additional reporting by Gul Yousafzai, Writing by Maria Golovnina, Editing by Angus MacSwan)

======================================
OnIslam & Newspapers
http://www.onislam.net/english/news/asia-pacific/470351-quran-desecration-flares-pakistan-tensions.html

Monday, 17 March 2014 00:00



OnIslam & Newspapers
Monday, 17 March 2014 00:00
In the wake of the incident, police imposed a curfew in the southern town to prevent tension escalation.

ISLAMABAD – Pakistan Muslim scholars have denounced attacks on a Hindu temple in Sindh's Larkana district, calling for urgent probe into the incident in which protests against Qur'an desecration turned into violent clashes.

“Our religion, Islam, preaches peace, love and forbearance,” Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi, the Chairman of the Pakistan Ulema Council (PUC), told The News on Monday, March 17.

“However, it is also necessary that the followers of other religions should respect the sentiments of the Muslims,” Ashrafi Urged.

Tensions flared after reports that a middle-aged hindu has torn out pages from the Muslims’ noble Qur’an, burning and tossing them down on the street from the roof of his home.

The news spread among the Muslim community who gathered to protest the blasphemous act on Saturday.

Later on, angry students from Islamic seminaries joined the protests, where clashes erupted between Muslims and Hindus before Larkana temple which led to setting fire on the temple.

“The law and order problem surfaced in the city Saturday evening after local residents accused a Hindu youth, Surjeet Kumar, of burning pages of the Holy Koran,” senior local administration official Ghunwar Leghari told AFP.

At least two Muslims were arrested after the incident.

Deploring the incident, the Ulema Council called on the government to protect minorities, including Hindus, and prevent violence.

“Pakistan is in need of peace and it is the responsibility of the political and religious parties as well as the leaders of the Muslims and non-Muslims to play their part in achieving the target of establishing a lasting peace in the country,” the PUC chairman said.

PUC leader has urged Sindh provience chief to ease tension and take measures to prevent future incidents.

“I also contacted PUC Sindh President Maulana Tariq Madni and asked him to play his role in quelling the tension between the Muslim and the Hindu communities.” Ashrafi, PUC Chairman said.

Similar tension erupted between Pakistani Hindus and Sikhs last September over sacrilege of the copies of latter’s holy book in various parts of Southern Sindh province, an act denounced by Pakistani Muslim religious leaders as contradicting with all faiths.

'No conspiracy'

The incident was immediately condemned by Sindh Minister for information, archive and local government who said any trials to foil tensions between the two faiths would fail.

“Any conspiracy to cause Hindu-Muslim confrontation would be foiled,” Sharjeel Innam Memon said.

The Pakistani official has also vowed a legal action against people involved in the communal incident.

According to Memon, Sindh government will compensate for the damage and will rebuild the temple.

In the wake of the incident, police imposed a curfew in the southern town to prevent tension escalation.

“The situation is not satisfactory,” Deputy Inspector General of Larkana, Khadim Rind, told Reuters.

“Sanjeet Kumar has been accused of desecrating the holy book by the locals.

“The accused is in our custody,” Rind stressed.

On the other hand, the Hindu community has denounced the desecration of Qur’an, saying that perpetrator is a “drug addict”.

“The man accused of blasphemy is a habitual drug addict and the Hindu community in Larkana can’t even think of disrespecting any community’s religious beliefs,” Kalpana Devi, the head of the local Hindu Panchayat, told a private TV channel, Online News reported.

Hindus are Pakistan’s second largest minority in Pakistan after Christian, whereas they are the largest minority in Sindh province. They constitute 2 per cent of total 180 million population of this South Asian nuclear Muslim state.

Out of total Hindu population, 92 per cent belong to schedule cast or lower cast, while 8 per cent belong to upper cast of Hindus. Upper caste Hindus are by and large rich, and educated-mostly involved in business, trade, and medical professions.

According to Pakistan’s blasphemy law, insulting any Prophet in Pakistan, a country where 95 percent of the population is Muslim, is a crime punishable with death or life imprisonment.

The law, commonly known as 295-C, was introduced in early 1980s by late President General Zia-ul-Haq.

Since then, some 700 cases of blasphemy have been registered, half of which are against Muslims.

But rights groups say the law is often exploited to settle personal scores.
===========

Muslim response to Hindu Temple torched in Larkana, Pakistan

$
0
0
URL - http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2014/03/muslim-response-to-hindu-temple-torched.html

The World Muslim Congress is joined by the Institute of Quranic knowledge and Intrafaith Religious Acceptance of Quran, and Pakistan American Association of Texas in condemning the violent act of burning the Hindu Temple in Larkana, Sindh, by an aggressive mob, unfortunately in the name of peace; Islam.


Reuters reported, “Hundreds of angry Pakistanis attacked a Hindu temple and set it on fire in southern Pakistan overnight following a rumour that a member of the Hindu community had desecrated the Koran, police and community leaders said on Sunday.”

As Muslims, we are embarrassed with the acts of these men who acted on their own, and we condemn these acts unequivocally, commented Mike Ghouse who heads the World Muslim Congress, a think tank in Dallas, Texas.

We do however, appreciate one small ray of hope, “The Pakistani Muslim scholars have denounced attacks on a Hindu temple in Sindh's Larkana district, calling for urgent probe into the incident in which protests against Qur'an desecration turned into violent clashes.”

The Muslim majority is deeply concerned about it, and we urge Muslims around the world in general and Pakistani Muslims in particular to create a fund to rebuild the temple that is the least one can do to fellow countrymen. Every society has a responsibility to guard the safety of its minorities, women, seniors and the children; no one should feel fearful of the majorities that is the hallmark of civil societies.

Dr. Basheer Ahmed of IQRA and Dr. Amer Suleman of PAAT felt the responsibility to take that first step in building a cohesive Pakistan where every Pakistani feels safe. The least we can do is to contribute towards restoring the Temple. The Pakistan American Association of Texas is celebrating the Pakistan day on March 23rd in Dallas, and has generously donated a booth at the Mela to raise the funds.  All proceeds will go towards restoration of the temple.

We have ways to go; a few among us feel insecure in our faith. God is not going anywhere, Quran will not disappear if someone desecrates or burns it, nor Prophet will be affected by any acts, they have been around, and Alhamdu Lillah they will be there forever.

It is odd that Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi, the Chairman of the Pakistan Ulema Council (PUC), told The News on Monday, March 17, “Our religion, Islam, preaches peace, love and forbearance,” Then he goes on to justify the violence. “However, it is also necessary that the followers of other religions should respect the sentiments of the Muslims.” This is disrespectful to Islam’s principles of peace.

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) prayed for those who threw rocks at him on his way to Taif, even Arch angel Gabriel offered to crush the miscreants, but prophet did not extract a pound of flesh, nor did he blame the miscreants, he forgave them and prayed for them unconditionally. That is the religion of peace, and that is the model we need to follow.

While Law and order brings the situation under control; it does not put off the fires completely, the dying sparks grow and explode again unless they are addressed.

Muslims at large are at fault for allowing the abuse of blasphemy laws in Pakistan, which is anathema to the Character of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), regarded as mercy to the mankind. It is time for us Muslims to mean it, that we the followers of Prophet Muhammad follow the principles of peace he taught us; indeed he was Rahmatul Aalameen - a mercy to mankind. No human should fear us, instead they should feel safe and secure and say it out of their hearts that Muslims are peace loving people and follow the principles of their prophet.

Do Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), Quran and God need our protection? If we believe that they need our protection, then we are dead wrong. As Muslims, we need to believe in the prophet, he is not going anywhere nor will he be hurt or harmed with any insults.

Islam stands on its own; it does not need our defense, and it is silly to protect God or the Prophet, they are not weaklings or our property to protect, they belong to the whole universe, don't they?

 If they curse the prophet, prophet is not going to be cursed, let us have the strength in our faith and return badness with Good, as he guided us to do; we know all the examples of his work, can we not be Rahmatul Aalameen to the people of the Alam?

Contact information

1.    Mike Ghouse, President, WMC,  MikeGhouse@aol.com (214) 325-1916

2.    Dr. Basheer Ahmed, President, IQRA,  mbahmed05@yahoo.com 

3.    Dr. Amer Suleman, President, PAAT,  suleman.amer@gmail.com

Funds can be donated to PAAT or IQRA, and funds of over $100.00 can be donated online at America Together Foundation http://americatogetherfoundation.com/donate/ - 100% of the proceeds will go the restoration of the temple. All donations will be reported, and donations of over $100 will be listed at WorldMuslimCongress.com website.

...............................................................................................................................
Mike Ghouse is a speaker, thinker and a writer on pluralism
, politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in Standing up for others and a book with the same title is coming up. Mike has a strong presence on national and local TV, Radio and Print Media. He is a frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on Fox TV, and a commentator on national radio networks, he contributes weekly to the Texas Faith Column at Dallas Morning News; fortnightly at Huffington post; and several other periodicals across the world. His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work through many links.

Religious tide turns against 'Noah' the hollywood film

$
0
0
I found the following article to be profound and thank Glenn Whip for sharing this. As a thinker and a writer, the following sentences from the article are inspiring and thoughtful fodder.  

As a Muslim, I am going to write a piece about it, hope sometimes soon, image depiction is not kosher in Islam – what is the wisdom in it? Think about it, didn’t the story telling create “subtle images” of the biblical-cum-Quranic figures in the minds of the listeners? Isn't it human to associate any character of a story with an image?  
Mike Ghouse

All are direct quotes from the article below.
"It's tough to make movies for the easily offended," Pepperdine University communications professor Craig Detweiler said. "Studios assume these biblical stories are in the public domain, but a lot of believers consider the Bible their private property, and if you don't interpret them the same way they've been taught, they're going to speak out."

There's plenty of wickedness in Aronofsky's "Noah." There has to be, otherwise God wouldn't have any reason to destroy the world. But there are a lot of other elements in the movie that audiences might not remember from Sunday school lessons, though they are found in the Bible  
The story of Noah can also be found in the Koran, which means the movie has been banned in Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates for violating Islamic rules on the depiction of prophets. In Egypt, a Sunni Muslim organization has issued a fatwa over the film, proving that blind, blanket judgments can cut across many faiths.

 Many films have been made by Christians, for Christians. For the most part, we're OK with that. However, I'm frankly as excited or more about the prospect that a movie would be made about the Bible that targets both Christians and people who aren't of a Christian faith. It opens up a dynamic opportunity for cultural conversation."

Christians protested Martin Scorsese's 1988 movie "The Last Temptation of Christ" based on hearsay, scandalized at the idea that the movie portrayed a sexualized Jesus. Had they bothered to watch the film, they would have learned that, in adapting Nikos Kazantzakis' novel, Scorsese was presenting the Jesus as taught in the Gospels — fully divine and fully human. The temptation of the title comes when Satan, trying to prevent Jesus from redeeming humanity by dying on the cross, seduces him with a vision of a normal life filled with family, love (yes, including sex ... but for the sake of procreation!) and simple pleasures. Jesus rejects the devil's temptation and accomplishes his mission.

"Growing up in the Catholic Church, the emphasis was always placed on the divine," Scorsese told me, talking about the movie. "And you'd watch a movie like 'The Greatest Story Ever Told' and it was like Jesus was this brilliant, glow-in-the-dark figure. I can't relate to that. It denies his humanity. And it doesn't teach you anything new. It doesn't make you think.

"Years before it ended up being made, I had a meeting with Paramount, [which] had originally signed up to make the movie," . And I was in a room with Barry Diller and Michael Eisner and Jeffrey Katzenberg and they asked why I wanted to make the film. And I answered, 'So I can get to know Jesus better.' Now, I'm not sure that's what they wanted to hear, but it was the truth."

Good piece
Mike Ghouse

Religious tide turns against 'Noah'

On Film: Devout Christians and Muslims follow a Hollywood tradition by listening to hearsay and alleging heresy regarding 'Noah,' the story in Genesis and the Koran.              

  •  
    http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-religious-movies-box-office-photos-20140227,0,3367934.photogallery
    Russell Crowe as the title character in "Noah."(Niko Tavernise / Paramount Pictures / October 18, 2012)
     
    Whenever Hollywood makes a movie from a well-loved story or saga — Batman, Tolkien, "50 Shades of Grey"— there's usually a period of ... well ... let's call it adjustment, along with a "spirited" give-and-take among fans over such things as casting, content and approach.
    Usually, though, the material's devotees don't believe the filmmakers will burn in hell if their ideas are ignored. (OK ... maybe the Dark Knight crowd does. We all know they can get a little intense.)
     
    But that's precisely the belief with "Noah,"Darren Aronofsky's $130-million retelling of the Old Testament account of apocalyptic deluge and a floating ark that opens on March 28. The same people who gripe that Hollywood never makes any faith-based movies are complaining because Hollywood has gone and made a religious movie, albeit one that might not be as literal-minded as they'd like.
     
    "It's tough to make movies for the easily offended," Pepperdine University communications professor Craig Detweiler said. "Studios assume these biblical stories are in the public domain, but a lot of believers consider the Bible their private property, and if you don't interpret them the same way they've been taught, they're going to speak out."
     
    Hollywood and religious groups have long been leery of each other, often with good reason. Cecil B. DeMille invited a host of religious representatives — Catholics and Protestants along with Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and Christian Scientists — to offer blessings on the first day of filming "King of Kings," his 1927 epic on the life and passion of Christ. And what did DeMille do after receiving the consecration? He opened "King of Kings" with an orgy scene that set up a love triangle among Jesus, Judas and Mary Magdalene. The man knew you needed more than just salvation to sell tickets. You needed a little sin too.
     
    There's plenty of wickedness in Aronofsky's "Noah." There has to be, otherwise God wouldn't have any reason to destroy the world. But there are a lot of other elements in the movie that audiences might not remember from Sunday school lessons, though they are found in the Bible — giant men, a monster called a Leviathan and a post-flood Noah getting drunk on wine and passing out naked. Also in the movie but not in the Bible (though it is fixed in church teaching) — people pounding on the ark's door after the torrential rain begins, pleading with Noah to let them inside to safety.
     
    "People think they know this story, but what they're remembering is just the basic framework they heard as kids," Aronofsky told me a couple of years back while we were espousing a mutual love for R. Crumb's illustrated Book of Genesis and the low-budget 1976 Sunn Classic documentary "In Search of Noah's Ark," a movie that looks like it cost $5 yet, according to the Internet Movie Data Base, grossed $55 million in its theatrical release.
     
    Venture outside that half-remembered framework, though, and you run the risk of drawing the wrath of evangelicals. When Christian screenwriter Brian Godawa obtained an old, undated version of the "Noah" screenplay in November 2012, he blogged his outrage, labeling Aronofsky's Noah an "environmentalist wacko" and warned that if you came to the movie expecting a "biblically faithful retelling of the story of the greatest mariner in history and a tale of redemption and obedience to God you'll be sorely disappointed."
     
    This pronouncement — the film unseen, an unfinished script reviewed a good year and a half before the movie's release date — made fine copy for culture-war types inclined to believe Hollywood enjoys nothing more than promoting its own progressive agenda at the expense of Christians' beliefs.
     
    And it also worried Paramount Pictures enough to eventually add a disclaimer to the movie's marketing materials, explaining that "while artistic license has been taken, we believe that this film is true to the essence, values and integrity of a story that is a cornerstone of faith for millions of people worldwide. The biblical story of Noah can be found in the Book of Genesis."
     
    The story of Noah can also be found in the Koran, which means the movie has been banned in Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates for violating Islamic rules on the depiction of prophets. In Egypt, a Sunni Muslim organization has issued a fatwa over the film, proving that blind, blanket judgments can cut across many faiths.
     
    "Scripture is sacred, so it's reasonable that people would approach with caution that a secular industry is depicting something they consider holy," John Snowden, a Christian who served as "Noah's" biblical advisor, told me in an email exchange. "I don't fault anyone's caution. Many films have been made by Christians, for Christians. For the most part, we're OK with that. However, I'm frankly as excited or more about the prospect that a movie would be made about the Bible that targets both Christians and people who aren't of a Christian faith. It opens up a dynamic opportunity for cultural conversation."
     
    Unfortunately, it rarely works that way. Christians protested Martin Scorsese's 1988 movie "The Last Temptation of Christ" based on hearsay, scandalized at the idea that the movie portrayed a sexualized Jesus. Had they bothered to watch the film, they would have learned that, in adapting Nikos Kazantzakis' novel, Scorsese was presenting the Jesus as taught in the Gospels — fully divine and fully human. The temptation of the title comes when Satan, trying to prevent Jesus from redeeming humanity by dying on the cross, seduces him with a vision of a normal life filled with family, love (yes, including sex ... but for the sake of procreation!) and simple pleasures. Jesus rejects the devil's temptation and accomplishes his mission.
     
    "Growing up in the Catholic Church, the emphasis was always placed on the divine," Scorsese told me, talking about the movie. "And you'd watch a movie like 'The Greatest Story Ever Told' and it was like Jesus was this brilliant, glow-in-the-dark figure. I can't relate to that. It denies his humanity. And it doesn't teach you anything new. It doesn't make you think.
     
    "Years before it ended up being made, I had a meeting with Paramount, [which] had originally signed up to make the movie," . And I was in a room with Barry Diller and Michael Eisner and Jeffrey Katzenberg and they asked why I wanted to make the film. And I answered, 'So I can get to know Jesus better.' Now, I'm not sure that's what they wanted to hear, but it was the truth."
    That kind of inquisitiveness doesn't seem to be the kind of approach that anyone wants to hear. But it's the only path to the kind of discovery that might deepen one's faith, both in religion and the movies that attempt to examine it.


    http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-ca-noah-on-film-20140330,0,7420386.story#ixzz2xGtHHa8p
  • Film about Quran Burning and Establishing Muslim Standards

    $
    0
    0

    FILM ABOUT ESTABLISHING MUSLIM STANDARDS

    The Film “American response to Quran burning” is based on actual happenings leading to 9/11/2013 when Pastor Jones had announced burning 3000 copies of Quran. Our response was in the form of clearly defined goals to find sustainable solutions.

    Our goals were to contain eruption of violence elsewhere in the world; offer and establish an alternate endorsable Muslim behavior by Muslims for Muslims; safety of Americans abroad; uphold the values of freedom of speech; donate blood, Muslims together to (all denominations) pray for the victims of 9/11 and well being of fellow humans (interfaith and Intrafaith); and above all change the perceptions about Muslims. 

    It was not an easy task, there were suspicions, disappointments, betrayal, outright rejection, but at the end, a new paradigm was established. Muslims were welcome by the folks from the Polk country Florida. It is a gripping story.

    I am looking for partners to fund $60,000.00 budget. It will be shot on actual location and hope to release on 9/11/14. It will be on par with any Hollywood movie. We hope to show it on PBS, Aljazeera or CNN or Fox News and enter for Oscars and other awards.
     



    A new Easter Tradition: Eggs with a Turkish Flavor

    $
    0
    0
    http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2014/04/a-new-easter-tradition-eggs-with.html

    20 Fascinating pictures of Eggs
    Artist:  World-renowned artist Haydar Hatemi
    By: Dr. Lachin Hatemi

    A fascination with eggs and their perfect form inspired Peter Carl Fabergé, who was a renowned jeweler and goldsmith to the Russian Imperial Court. Fabergé created a total of 50 Imperial Easter Eggs for Russian emperors from 1885 to 1917, which became an Easter tradition in the Russian Imperial Court. When Russian Revolution of 1918 dethroned the Russian Czar, it also ended the storied Faberge tradition.

    World-renowned artist Haydar Hatemi always wanted to create his own egg collection and bring the Faberge tradition back to life. While working on an egg collection for the Shah of Iran and Empress Farah Diba Pahlavi, Hatemi’s project prematurely ended, just like Faberge’s, due to a revolution. The Islamic Revolution of 1979 sent Iran into turmoil, and the Shah of Iran was forced to leave his country. A few years later, Hatemi left Iran himself with his family, but he never forgot about his dream.

    Hatemi’s popularity continued to grow in his new adopted homeland of Turkey, where he re-established his atelier in 1983.  He was fascinated with the Ottoman Empire with his exuberance and glamour. After many years of creating Ottoman inspired art, Hatemi decided to fulfill his longtime dream of creating an egg collection, which became the inspiration for the “Ottoman Empire Collection.” Hatemi chose ostrich eggs as his medium.

    When he first encountered a raw ostrich egg, Haydar recognized it as an ideal medium for his art. An ostrich eggs, with its porcelain-like qualities and texture, was a perfect choice. To create these precious eggs, Hatemi invented a special process to prepare the eggs for paintings. Each egg, an artistic tour de force, took two months or more to make.

    The series of lavish Easter eggs created by Hatemi for his royal clientele between 2004 and 2012 is regarded as one of the artist’s most creative projects. These eggs are also considered as some of the latest great commissions of objects d’art in Middle East and Turkey. Haydar Hatemi created the Ottoman Sultans’ collection to commemorate one of the longest lasting and powerful dynasties of our near history. Thirty-six sultans who were all descendant of the Othman, the founder of the Ottoman Dynasty, led the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman period, particularly during the 16th and 17th centuries, was marked by geopolitical dominance and cultural prowess, during which the sultans claimed the spiritual leadership of the Muslim world, before the empire’s slow decline culminated in its collapse during World War I.

    Now, as Turkey emerges as a leader in the Middle East, its history is more appreciated. The Ottoman Collection is created for admirers of Ottoman history and legacy. Hatemi describes the Sultan series as a dream project and attributes his preoccupation with the Ottomans for his long residencies in Istanbul and Bursa, both of which served as capital cities of the dynasty throughout its long history.












































    Hatemi’s future plans include a new series depicting the Ottoman queens, which will commemorate the powerful women of the Ottoman Empire. We look forward to see Hatemi’s next egg collection.
    ------------

    Reestablishing the right Muslim attitudes toward conflict mitigation and bringing a change in how they are perceived, and treasuring the freedom of speech.

    $
    0
    0

    A New paradigm for the Muslim World  
    S U M M A R Y
     
    When Pastor Jones announced burning 2998 copies of Qur'an on Wednesday, September 11, 2013; one for each American life lost on September 11, 2001, we decided to bring a closure to the sacrifice of our men and women in the most honored way and not by burning the Qurans.  

    We were set out to achieve a few clearly defined goals:

    To communicate to the Muslim World that our God-given right to freedom of speech is a value we treasure and hold it dear to us; ultimately it is the freedom that uplifts the whole humanity. Indeed, Islam is one of the greatest beneficiaries of this freedom.
    To offer an alternate Muslim behavior model to become the standard for future conflicts, indeed we can call it a genuine Islamic response based on Quran and the examples of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

    To be instrumental in the safety of fellow Americans serving in the armed forces, and Americans traveling overseas in conflicts zones.
    To undo the wrong responses acted out by a few Muslims in the past,  and shrink the propaganda in proportion to the tiny percent of people, a non-representative sample.  We have learned and have come to anticipate what Muslims will do when someone criticizes Islam, Prophet Muhammad, or threatens to burn the Quran.

    To build cohesive Societies where no human has to live in apprehension, discomfort or fear of the other, we wanted to mitigate conflicts and nurture good will and invariably offer pluralistic solutions on issues of the day.

    The support from fellow Americans was encouraging in establishing this new paradigm. The folks from Mulberry Florida particularly Suzanne Carter and her “Not in Mulberry” team, Butch Rahman, Curtis Rahman, Mayor Hatch, Mayor Fields and Sheriff’s office were the key partners in the situation.  I must express our gratitude to Suzie Schottelkotte of the Ledger Newspaper for fair reporting of the situation.

    We also appreciate Joelle Fiss for the encouragement and support she has offered in this effort by joining us, and uplifting our work.

    The Muslim support from around the world was indeed encouraging.  Just about every Muslim Newspaper has published our press release and many have endorsed this to be the right thing to do.

    This is a new paradigm in bringing a change, a critical milestone for Muslims in the United States and around the world.

    The Mulberry event seeded the change about how Muslims are perceived, and how they would react to future Quran burning, criticism of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and Islam.

    We have decided to make a film about it.

    Links are provided to nearly 30 original articles about the event, however, it was published in over 300 Newspapers around the world.


    THE GENESIS

    When Pastor Jones announced burning 2998 copies of Qur'an on Wednesday, September 11, 2013, one for each American life lost on September 11, 2001, I said to myself we have to bring a closure to the sacrifice of our men and women in the most honored way and not by burning the Qurans.

    We also need to bring a closure to the damage 9/11 has done to the relationship between Muslims and America, though the majority on both sides did not blame each other, the few among both made it difficult by promoting fear, hatred and blame with recurring nagging activities.

    Just like the actions of Pastor Terry Jones and his handful of supporters do not represent 318 Million Americans, the actions of the 19 and their respective cheer leaders do not represent 1.6 Billion Muslims either. We all owe it ourselves to understand this clearly, so none of us lives in anxiety, and continue to live in hate of each other. 

    We all have a legitimate concern on how a handful of Muslims react elsewhere in the world to
    criticism of Prophet Muhammad, Islam and Qur'an, and how Muslims are perceived by fellow humanity in general and Americans in particular.  Hence we deliberated on actions to bring about sustainable solutions; the answer was in moving the Tenth Annual Unity Day USA event to Mulberry, Florida. The Unity Day brings people of different faiths, races and ethnicities to rededicate our pledge to one nation and a commitment to her safety, security and Unity. What better way to honor 2998 men, women and children than burning Quran.

    Thanks to the print and web media – every Major Newspaper in the world has carried the stories and at least two dozen original pieces have been written about the event. A whole lot of it is listed at
    www.WorldMuslimCongress.com.

    The most important endorsements came from Muslims sites - Shia, Sunni and other Muslims groups. Whether it is Saudi Gazette, or Ahle-Bayt (Shia) News in Iran and the Muslim Majority Nations have covered it all.

    WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM MUSLIMS?

    The following are some of the many responses we the Americans have learned and anticipate when someone criticizes Islam, Prophet Muhammad, or Quran;  
    1.      Violence – burning embassies, cars and destruction of property….
    2.      Calling Names, cursing or killing the one who said bad things about the three
    3.       Enflame the situation by adding fuel to the fire by talk of avenge or revenge
    4.      Passing the buck – blame the other “illiterate Muslims”, fringe elements etc.
    5.      Get Defensive
    What the world has not seen is a genuine Muslim response!

    Our goal was to offer an alternate behavior model as a standard, indeed we can call it a genuine Islamic response based on what the Prophet has said, and the verses from Quran. This behavior can also be called Christian, Jewish, Hindu or plain common sense responsible response.

    Saving a life is like saving the whole humanity says the Quran, a book of guidance like all other holy books in building harmony in a given society. It is about building societies that care for other for the ultimate benefit of each member of the society. (
    more about it at Huffington Post)

    The Muslim Community has taken up the responsibility in past several years to donate blood, and last year, the target was to collect 11,000 pints on the 11thanniversary and collected 11,170 Pints.  The Muslims for Life blood drive campaign emphasizes the sanctity of life, a teaching inherent in all religious traditions.  The Muslim
    Community USA has set a goal to collect 12,000 pints of blood, which will help save up to 36,000 lives. 

    The model is not new at all, indeed, it was established by Jesus, Muhammad and all the spiritual Masters (peace be upon them)  including non-religious and secular traditions; that of mitigating conflicts and nurturing goodwill for the common good of the society; a cohesive society where no one has to live in apprehension or fear of the other.
    Jesus called that Kingdom of heaven and Muhammad called it submission to a coherent system called Islam. A majority of people in all faiths believe in the beauty of their faith; however a few in each group don’t get that or abuse the faith to their advantage in making enemies out of those who differ.

    Indeed, Prophet Muhammad taught that "To overcome evil with good is good, and to resist evil by evil is evil." It is also strongly enjoined in the Qur’an in the same verse 41:34, “Good and evil deeds are not equal. Repel evil with what is better; then you will see that one who was once your enemy has become your dearest friend.” (Full Press release at World Muslim Congress).

    The folks in the Town of Mulberry and Polk County, Florida were ready for a new model to work in dealing with the situation, and they did, and have set an example to the world. Should this happen elsewhere in the United States, the folks can look up to the Mulberry example of giving hope and strengthening what is good.

    Indeed Mulberry Mayor Hatch said, "One man or a handful of men and women do not represent the values of half a million folks of Polk County". Mayor Fields of Lakeland shared that humanity has a history of abusing the holy books for individual gains and we cannot accept that. Sgt. Regina Moran, representing Polk County Sheriff's office called for mutual respect and acceptance of the other. Butch Rahman, a resident of Polk County emphasized, "Terry Jones begged every property owner in Polk County to allow him to burn the Quran on their property—and not one person accepted. No one is buying his idea and he is isolated on an island of hate. He does not represent us.” and added,  "I am proud of Polk County's response in rejecting hate and promoting a positive message of American diversity."

    In the words of Suzanne carter, “As a Christian, the bible teaches us to love our neighbors— it doesn’t say what our neighbor has to look like or believe in—it just says neighbor.”  Lynn Broom of Not in Mulberry Organization adds, "You can't fight hate with hate" and Curtis Rahman, a high schooler was clear ," "Al-Qaida is dangerous, not Islam or Muslims". Similar sentiments were expressed by ordinary folks (2 videos).

    Imagine the reservation and apprehension when a Muslim steps into their town – I am sure they expected one of the five behaviors from this Muslim, but thanks to the Model of the Prophet – "Amin” that I followed to the best of my ability. The folks reciprocated.   

    Amin was a title accorded to the Prophet by fellow residents of Mecca who were Jewish, Christians, Pagan and others. To be Amin is to be truthful, to be worthy of trust, to be just and to be a source of safety and security to others.  The folks in Mulberry reciprocated with equal kindness.


    For a public good to succeed, it has to be un-selfish, and no one has anything to gain from it but the community at large. Our volunteer team in Mulberry (listed on the site) followed the same model. None of us wanted anything out of it except the common good.

    We hoped this would be a life changing event, most people fell in in love with the idea that all of us Americans will come together as Americans and nothing but Americans. While we have our sub-identity, we look to each other as Americans and rededicate ourselves to our pledge; one nation with liberty and justice for all. 

    Mulberry is a part of history in creating a model behavior in dealing with conflicts and building a cohesive America, where no American has to live in apprehension or fear of the other

    I want to emphasize a note about service.  My good friend said a prayer for me that I have earned a prime spot in paradise, but I was quick to say, I do not way any such place. – We should not be driven by wages for the service we render, if we get paid, and then it would not be service any more. We should rather do our share of work for creating a better world, as the Bhagvad Gita says, do your dharma and not be driven by the fruit.
    Thanks to my key partners in the event - Butch Rahman, Suzanne Carter, Lynn Broom, Linda Jezard and others including the Mayors, police, Fire chiefs, Sheriff’s office and the media friends for placing their trust in me and believing that we will do the right thing – and not leave a mess behind for them to deal with later.

    Suzanne traveled with me to the site where Jones was going to burn Quran, we had a good conversation, and I appreciate the trust she placed in me. Butch asked me, a stranger to stay in his home with his family, and I am glad I did. I am sure Prophet Muhammad would be smiling at me, but at least I feel good for following in his footsteps – to be the Amin.

    After all, the Qurans were not burned.

    Pastor Jones and his fellow Pastor were arrested, and their truck and the trailer with kerosene doused Qurans were confiscated an hour before the scheduled burning at 5:00 PM on September 11, 2013. They were charged for carrying open arms, a 45 caliber Smith and Wesson, and not having the license tag for the trailer, a road hazard with Kerosene doused books on an open road. Both the men were released after paying a bail of $1250 each. Full story at the Mulberry Ledger: 
    http://www.theledger.com/article/20130911/NEWS/130919800/0/search


    The Pastor has said that he will repeat the event, and on our part, we will repeat our unity and prayers, and pray for the well being of the Pastor. May God forgive him and have him join us in creating a safer America for every American. I will continue to pursue to have a dialogue with the pastor and answer what exactly about Quran that bothers him. If it happens, it will be in a public forum.

    To quote from Jeffrey Weiss' article he wrote in
    Religion News Service, and copied by virtually every major News paper in America including the Washington Post, Huffington Post and others. It was a challenge to Pastor Jones.



     “If you find five faults in Quran in a public discussion, I will abandon my faith and join your ministry. … On the other hand, if you cannot find faults, I am going to be easy on you, I will not ask you to become a Muslim, but ask you join me to do the work of Christ and Muhammad in building a cohesive America, where no American has to live in fear of the other. Jesus called that the Kingdom of Heaven.
    “You and I owe it to America to demystify the myths and allay mutual fears. I am putting myself out for the common good of America and I hope you take up the challenge and join me in contributing to the greatness of America.”
    Now, the pastor is as likely to agree to this debate as he is to ride a unicorn. So why even bother?
    “You are right. He will not take it,” Ghouse said. “But that also gives fellow Americans the hope that it is not the Quran, it is the bad practices of a few Muslims that taints the religion.”



    This is what it takes to create a good society, where we all can enjoy living in it, and that is what the role of a Muslim ought to be. If you feel your dollars produce direct results, we invite you to donate $100 and over: http://americatogetherfoundation.com/donate/  and your support will be listed at www.UnityDayUSA.com and www.WorldMuslimCongress.com  

    I am grateful to all the sponsors and those who have pledged and may donate, but particularly the support from the magnificent seven for this event.

    Mirza A Beg, my moral support and silent partner in the press releases and possible reports. Dr. Basheer Ahmed, Dr. Nauman Anwar and Farooq Hemani have always supported the work we do; I don’t have to ask them, they volunteer to fund the work. Then this time around – Butch Rahman turned in $100 on the 1stday I met him towards the cost of the work, Suzanne Carter for joining in with her superb team of volunteers. Moazam Syed was the first one to donate – this is all encouragement. All their contributions are listed on the site for transparency and accountability purpose, and more importantly their support has produced direct results.

    God willing, we will put a book together with the full story, of all the little and big things, good things, and bad things that have happened in the process. The book will include feedback from the involved and the ordinary.
     


    FEEDBACK THAT IS REPRESENTATIVE OF MULBERRY SENTIMENT
    Terry Jones a Bad Apple in the Christian Faith Who Brought Hate to Mulberry
    Published: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 at 12:01 a.m in Mulberry Ledger.
    Well, it's all over in Mulberry — or is it?

    The Christian Quran book burner went to jail and the World Muslim Congress that has held it Unity Day event for the past nine years has returned to Dallas. The book burner came to Mulberry in hate and the Muslims came to Mulberry in peace to counter the hate.

    The book burner is going to find out he can't break the law in Mulberry and get off without a stiff penalty. The World Muslim Congress from Dallas are gone but not forgotten, and they are welcome to return. They came in peace with a record of doing the Unity Day Celebration for the past eight years.

    The group included local residents of differing faiths, and they showed respect and to love our neighbors with understanding to achieve worldwide balance. This reasoning is part of my Christian faith. I wish I had been there and I wish the Muslin Unity Day Celebration would have had more support from the churches.

    We are not going to have world peace until we can come together without regard to race or religious beliefs. Being divisive and not willing to understand the other side is not the Christian way. It does not mean Christianity has to accept the Muslim or any other way. It means love your neighbor and do unto others as … you know the rest and what is right.

    The Muslims summed it up best when they prayed for the fallen heroes who died on 9/11 from a "few bad apples in the Muslim faith." I can understand that logic by adding we have a "lot of bad apples in the Christian faith," and one of them brought hate to Mulberry.

    DON OVERSTREET
    Mulberry


     
    A DOZEN TAKE AWAYS:
    1.      The Mayors, police, fire chief, religious leadership and volunteers along with representatives of many different religious traditions joined (video clip) in echoing the sentiment of respecting Quran without compromising on the free speech guaranteed in our constitution.

    2.      Indeed Mayor Hatch said, "One man or a handful of men and women do not represent the values of half a million folks of Polk County" or 318 million Americans. Mayor Fields shared that humanity has a history of abusing the holy books for individual gains, in the words of Butch Rahman - not a single property owner offered their place to the pastor to burn the Qurans – no one in the county was buying his idea.  In the words of Suzanne carter, her bible does not teach her to hate the neighbors. Similar sentiments were expressed by ordinary folks (2 videos).

    3.      The above is a reassuring feedback; ignoring Jones would have deprived fellow Americans and the Muslims around the world with that kind of hope giving information.

    4.      The media sincerely presented the event as it was – in the positive light without putting a dimmer on it. Our original Press release was augmented by front page news in Times of India and an effective endorsement op-ed by Saudi gazette and carried by over 50 news outlets. The final touch came from Jeff Weiss of Religion News, which was picked up by every major newspaper in the World. At home in Mulberry, the ledger reported factual information of everything that was happening with Pastor Jones or the Unity Day USA event. I Googled it, the report was published in every major language of the world.

    5.      An alternate behavior model is established in dealing with conflicts, instead of the routine condemnations. This model was indeed set by Jesus and Prophet Muhammad, and we merely followed it.
    6.      Fellow Americans witnessed a major paradigm change; that Muslims do speak out and offer choices besides condemning or doing nothing.

    7.      That Muslims are partners in nation building and building a cohesive America.

    8.      The program reiterated that Muslims pray for the wellbeing of all humanity, and not just MUSLIMS. It's not a new idea, but practiced by a majority of Muslims quietly. We want to reiterate the Quranic verses.....Full article at Huffpost and our first press release.

    9.      We were clear- we honor fellow citizens thru prayers and respecting Quran.

    10.As a part of the published program, we broke for prayers, thanks to Sunni, Shia, WD Muhammad, Ahmadiyya Muslims and other Muslims for joining us in the optional special prayers. I was blessed to have led the 2 Rakat Nafl, Alhamdulillah we all prayed together. 

    11.I'm sure Prophet Muhammad would be pleased with our work. I followed his example of becoming the Amin.  The city loved the message, now; they actually know what MUSLIMS are about. There is an alternate positive example.

    12.A new found respect for Muslims, and Muslims were seen as doing the right thing, just, truthful and trustworthy. We are glad we responded positively instead of complaining. 
    This is a new paradigm in bringing a change, a critical milestone for Muslims in the United States.

    I request you, the members at World Muslim Congress and the Foundation for Pluralism to add your succinct but pragmatic comment in 50 words or less for possible inclusion in the book.  A sponsor for the book is welcome by individuals or an organization. The book would be a compilation of many articles, your comments and reports in the media.   

    This book will be a must read for any one before building a Mosque in Murfreesboro, a Ground Zero Mosque or planning a major event. The proceeds will go towards nurturing the pluralistic values of Islam and building cohesive societies to live and let live.

    I will be happy to give a talk on the subject of how to become a productive citizen of America and earn the respect as a fully participating and contributing member of the society at large.  
    God willing we will do things with boldness and clarity.

    A full report will be prepared and mailed to the ones who want to read.
    Just Google “Quran Burning”,  “Mike Ghouse” or “Pastor Terry Jones” for that time period,  – you will be amazed with the print and web media coverage. Every Major Newspaper in the world has covered it in positive terms, a healthy change.


    The most important endorsements came from Muslims sites - Shia, Sunni and others. The key contributing articles are on the panel at World Muslim Congress and Unity Day USA.

    The most important endorsements came from Muslims Newspapers and websites - Shia, Sunni and others. Whether it is Saudi Gazette, or Ahle-Bayt (Shia) News in Iran and the Muslim Majority Nations have covered it all. There is leadership vacuum out there, when the right thing is said, they grab it and it is encouraging.

    THE PRESS RELEASE THAT TRIGGERRED AN AVALANCHE OF ARTICLES:

    Planned Muslim Response to Qur'an Burning by Pastor Jones on September 11 in Mulberry, Florida


    PRESS RELEASE

    August 19, 2013| Dallas, Texas

    Contact: 
    Mike Ghouse (214) 325-1916 - MikeGhouse@aol.com
    Mirza A. Beg (205) 454-8797 -Mirza.a.beg@gmail.com
    Website: 
    www.WorldMuslimCongress.com


    We plan to respond to pastor Terry Jones' planned burning of 3000 copies of Quran on September 11, 2013 in positive terms with dignity and grace.

    As Muslims and Americans we honor the free speech guaranteed in our constitution. We have no intentions to criticize, condemn or oppose Pastor Terry Jones' freedom of expression. Instead, we will be donating blood and praying for goodness to permeate in our society.

    Indeed, we are concerned about the violent reactions to Quran burning by the fringe elements among Muslims elsewhere in the world, and through the message of Quran, and the Prophet we hope to mitigate the violence and nurture goodwill.  The safety of fellow Americans and fellow humans around the world is our goal. 

    Our response would include reclaiming the standard of behavior practiced by the Prophet concerning “scurrilous and hostile criticism of the Qur’an” (Muhammad Asad Translation Note 31, verse 41:34). It was "To overcome evil with good is good, and to resist evil by evil is evil." It is also strongly enjoined in the Qur’an in the same verse 41:34, “Good and evil deeds are not equal. Repel evil with what is better; then you will see that one who was once your enemy has become your dearest friend.”  

    God willing Muslims will follow the divine guidance and pray for the restoration of Goodwill, and on that day many Muslim organizations will go on a “blood drive” to save lives and serve humanity with kindness.

    We invite fellow Americans of all faiths, races, and ethnicities to join us to rededicate the pledge, “One nation under God”, and to build a cohesive America where no American has to live in apprehension, discomfort or fear of fellow Americans.  This event is a substitute for our 10th Annual Unity Day Celebration (www.UnitydayUSA.com) held in Dallas, but now it will be at Mulberry, Florida.

    Unwittingly Pastor Jones has done us a favor by invigorating us by his decision to burn nearly 3000 copies Quran on September 11, 2013. Obviously he is not satisfied by the notoriety he garnered by burning one Qur'an last year. 

    We plan to follow Jesus Christ (pbuh), a revered prophet in Islam as well as Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) – that of mitigating the conflicts and nurturing good will for the common good of the society. 


    We hope, this event and the message will remind Muslims elsewhere in the world as well, that violence is not the way. Muslims, who react violently to senseless provocation, should realize that, violence causes more violence, and besmirches the name of the religion that we hold so dear. We believe that Prophet Muhammad was a mercy to the mankind, and we ought to practice what we believe and preach. We must not insult Islam by the negative reactions of a few.

    We can only hope it will bring about a change in the attitude of the followers of Pastor Jones, and in the behavior of those Muslims who reacted violently the last time Pastor sought notoriety – We hope this small step towards a bridge to peaceful coexistence would propel us towards building a cohesive society.

    Like most Americans a majority of Muslims quietly go about their own business, but it is time to speak up and take positive action instead of negative reaction. May this message of peace and goodwill reverberate and reach many shores. 

    Lastly, we appreciate the Citizens of Mulberry, Florida, Honorable Mayor George Hatch, City Commissioners, police and Fire Chiefs for handing this situation very well.  This will add a ‘feather of peace’ in the City’s reputation. We hope Mulberry will be a catalyst in showing the way in handling conflict with dignity and peace.


    We hope, our mercy based message will remind Muslims to follow the examples of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), a mercy to mankind to contribute towards a better world.  We believe it may also bring a change in the attitudes of followers of Pastor Jones, and in the behavior of those Muslims who reacted violently the last time Pastor sought notoriety.

    We thank the Media for giving value to the work towards peace rather than conflict.

    URL- 
    http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2013/08/planned-muslim-response-to-quran_18.html 

    What exactly will be do on that day? Please visit 
    www.UnitydayUSA.com  

    Thank you.

    Mike Ghouse, President
    World Muslim Congress
    www.WorldMuslimCongress.com 

    Mission of World Muslim Congress


    To be a Muslim is to be a peace maker, one who constantly seeks to mitigate conflicts and nurtures goodwill for peaceful co-existence of humanity. Just about every activity of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) consisted those two elements. God wants us to live in peace and harmony with his creation; Life and Matter.
    We are driven by the Qur'an, Al-Hujurat, Surah 49:13: "O mankind! We have created you male and female, and have made you nations and tribes that ye may know one another. The noblest of you, in sight of Allah, is the best in conduct. Allah Knows and is Aware."

    Our Mission
    Our Mission at World Muslim congress is to work for a world of co-existence through inclusiveness and participation. As a member of diverse family of faiths, our efforts will be directed towards justice and equity to attain peace for the humankind with a firm grounding in commonly held values. We cannot have advantages at the cost of others. Such benefits are temporary and deleterious to lasting peace. We believe what is good for Muslims has got to be good for the world, and vice versa, for the goodness to sustain.
    Indeed we aspire to promote goodwill amongst people of different affiliations, regardless of their faith, gender, race, nationality, culture or any other uniqueness blessed by the creator.


    A FEW OF THE MANY ARTICLES ARE IN THE LINK


    Additional papers:




    Fixing Sharia Laws


    The right-wing Muslims will scream at me for questioning the divinity of Sharia, and the right-wing Christians, Jews, Hindus, and others will be calling me names, as this essay does not condemn Sharia. They simply cannot see another point of view.
    Rather than the outright rejection of Sharia, which serves as a system of justice to the given populations in Muslim majority nations, we need to fix the laws; without it a large swatch of population becomes rudderless. Our own constitution has been amended several times, and that is what is needed to be done with Sharia.
    However, the moderate majorities in all groups see the value in fixing the cancerous cells, rather than rejecting the whole system.  Unless we fix things, injustice in the name of justice will continue.
    The golden rule is central to all religions that say, "Treat others as you want to be treated."  There is not a religion on the earth that teaches one to treat the other any less.   Most people get their religion right, and some don't.

    The conservative men tend to be insecure when dealing with women; no matter what faith they belong to, they behave the same. Their perceived safety hinges on keeping some one or the other under their thumb; usually women.

    Sharia was a human effort to dispense justice to fellow beings in accordance with Quran and the Prophet's examples; however, men are fallible beings and have failed to deliver justice. They have got it all wrong when it comes to women, apostates, blasphemers and the victims of rape. Sharia as practiced in a few of the Muslim nations does not reflect God's wisdom or the practice of the prophet. It needs to be fixed badly.
    Our conservative lot gets offended when Sharia is criticized as they (mistakenly) believe that Sharia is God's law, delivered like Quran, and it is not. Criticizing Sharia is the right thing to do, after all how are we going to fix it?    
    Muslims need to feel secure that God is not going anywhere, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is not going anywhere nor Qur'an will disappear; they are eternal. God tells the prophet not to worry if people don't listen to his message, because he is the one who gives guidance. God also says he will protect his system (religion), shouldn't we trust in God? The conservatives, be it Christian, Muslim, Jews, Hindus or others, don't really trust in God, and aggressively preempt him.
    Just as Americans cannot fathom any other form of law other than the one we know, the Muslims in Muslim majority nations cannot imagine any other law either. Our laws are not perfect, and neither is theirs. We have amended ours many a time, and need to include marriage-equality amendment and more. The Muslims have not made amendments to Sharia in a long time.  It is time to fix it and keep the laws to serve justice to the Muslim populations.
    A majority of Muslim nations are not familiar with any other laws; they will resist pushing new codes on them, just as we would. Remember the Obama-care battle? We need to understand them and encourage amendments.  There is nothing wrong with the intent of Sharia; it's the corruption that needs fixing, when done, and Sharia would be as good as any other law aligning fully with the human-rights declaration.
    Let's deal with a few Sharia-related issues concerning  rape victims, apostasy, blasphemy, and treatment of rape victims.
    Rape
    The Council of Islamic Ideologies (CII) in Pakistan declared that DNA evidence in case of rape is supplementary, and they still require the four male witnesses to prosecute the rapists. Science (knowledge) means nothing to conservatives whether they are Christians or Muslims.   
    Asma Jahangir, the human rights activist of Pakistan, responded, "The council members were refusing to reach out for the truth in rape cases and had given such urgency and prominence to their recommendation as if acceptance of DNA testing was a great threat to Islam."
    Moazam Syed wrote in the World Muslim Congress forum, "So a rape victim needs to produce four pious Muslims, who must have watched the full act of rape?" A few conservative Muslims may not like this statement, but  that pales to the misery of the rape victim, who endures the anguish for her entire life.  
    That ain't justice, and that ain't Islam. The conservatives are not only defensive, but carry an attitude; any suggestion of reason or application of logic threatens them, and they scream that their religion is threatened. I have heard these sentences from Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Jews, and all other right-wingers in different circumstances.
    A documentary (Pakistan) is in the making where a 13-year-old girl returning from the school was gang raped, and the damned judge was embarrassed that she dared to bring the case to his court, and the men laughed and questioned, why was she not at home? Shamefully, this is also a part of the men's attitude in America - she asked for it. 
    I am glad they had the sense at least to debate, in Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and Iran; the woman would have been brutally stoned to death -- again, that is not Islam and purely the men culture of those nations.

    Honor killing is not a thing to be slapped on to Muslims.  In Punjab, Haryana, and other parts of the subcontinent, the Hindus and Sikhs also kill their victim girls to protect the honor of their family. I am sure if we Google it, we may find surprises elsewhere.

    Learning
    The first word in Islam is "Iqra" -- meaning read, recite, and understand. That was the first word uttered to Prophet Muhammad by angel Gabriel. Iqra opens the door to everything in life. On another occasion, the prophet said, if you have to learn something new, don't hesitate to go anywhere, including far- off lands like China.
    The prophet did not say, "Your minds are being plucked out, you don't need it any more to think, everything is given to you in Quran and my examples, just follow it." Indeed the Prophet said, in his last sermon, that he was leaving this book to his followers to read, understand, and follow it.   
    Doesn't learning imply reading, observing, understanding, and adopting the new information to the existing conditions for a better life and a better society?
    Not all Muslims, but a few of the self-appointed guardians of religion, do not listen to God or the prophet. They have the arrogance to reject Iqra or go to China for learning. They have shut themselves out from learning and push others to do the same. Should we let them? Are they responsible for our actions?
    Divorce
    These men eagerly approved and adopted the text-message divorces and even e-mail divorces because they cared about men and not the women who were thrown under the bus at the whim of the idiot men. This is not justice and this is not Islam.
    Some of the conservative men don't believe in equality of women, and simply don't listen to the prophet. Yet from that very same mouth, they say, "Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is a mercy to mankind" -- Do they fully understand what it means?  Fourteen hundred years ago, the Prophet declared that women are free to own property, own their business, initiate marriage and divorce, and could disobey their husbands if they were coerced into doing things against their will.  That is Islam.
    A majority of Muslims believe in it; a few don't but get the media attention. Do we talk about good husbands? We always focus on the bad ones who are violent whether they are American, Chinese, and Arab, Indian, Hispanic, or Russian men.
    1200 years later, the western societies accorded that status to women,  including the passage of women's-suffrage act here in America just a hundred years ago, while a few conservative Muslim societies have gone back to the times before the prophet. 
    Apostasy
    Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did not punish apostates, that are those who chose to abandon Islam, and yet Pastor Naderkhani in Iran is being harassed; Abdul Rahman in Afghanistan and Lena Joy in Malaysia were relieved with the international pressures.

    Prophet was clear, there is no compulsion in religion, and you cannot force any one to believe who does not want to believe. His own uncle chose not to believe in Islam; did the Prophet punish him?  This is a divine intentional example from God for people to learn, that there is no compulsion in faith; let anyone believe what he or she is comfortable with.  There is confusion among the average Muslims, and it behooves for Muslims to put this thing behind and move on.  It is time to follow the prophet and universally declare that there is no punishment for apostasy. 
    Blasphemy
    Prophet Muhammad did not punish anyone for blasphemy.  Instead he did the right thing; prayed for them. The self-appointed guardians of Sharia laws can tell great many stories of the prophet, yet they do the opposite. 
    The blasphemy laws go against the God-given freedom and it aids the crooks to abuse it. In Pakistan a damned crook framed a girl for desecrating Quran.  A whole Christian town was destroyed before they discovered the truth; at least that is the saving grace
    Muslims believe that we are answerable to God on the Day of Judgment. The more of us speak up, the greater the chance of delivering justice to fellow beings; if we don't, then evil persists. The least a Muslim can do is to speak up.
    Sharia was a human effort in delivering justice to fellow beings in accordance with Quran and the Prophet's examples; however, humans are fallible beings and are not delivering justice to women, apostates, blasphemers and rapists, and the raped.  Sharia as practiced in a few of the Muslim nations does not reflect God's wisdom nor does it correspond with prophet's practice. It needs to be fixed badly before we sink with our sins of injustice to women.  More about Sharia at www.sharialaws.com.  

    To be a
    Muslim is to be a peacemaker, one who mitigates conflicts and nurtures goodwill for peaceful co-existence of humanity. God wants us to live in peace and harmony with his creation, life and matter.

    Continued:





    Criticism of Islam, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and free speech

    We need to welcome every criticism of Quraan, Islam and the Prophet and deal with it with grace. Let freedom of speech be the corner stone of Islam.


    Islam is not going anywhere; prophet is not going anywhere, and by opening ourselves up to criticism, we will learn a lot more about our faith than we would ever know. We need to move away from intolerance to acceptance of a different point of view without having to agree with it. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) lived through it and Muslims can learn from his examples.

    Criticism can fade away or rain on us depending on how Muslims respond to it.  Lack of conviction in one's faith breeds intolerance towards criticism, whereas firmness in faith can lead us to learn from criticism, explore the infinite wisdom and realize the strength of our faith (Imaan); a worthy feeling to have, instead of living in doubt and shooing criticism away.

    You may ask, "Why are you presenting a different point of view, and why should I believe you?" The great scholars from the past have done it, and what is the need for me to learn?

    I will ask you, "Why wouldn't you review the work of Tariq Ramadan, Hamza Yusuf, Ziauddin Sardar, Wahiduddin Khan, Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, Asghar Ali Engineer, Chandra Muzaffar, and a host of other critical Muslim thinkers? Why should you believe every word of Maududi, Banna and others? Isn't Islam for all times and all people?

    Way back in 1967, my sister had asked me, if I knew more than Allama Iqbal? That question has never left my mind, and I had to scramble for the answer, the answer was a definite no, but I did not want to discard individual responsibility of not learning and knowing it on my own. I was always stuck with one of the most powerful sentences from Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) last sermon, "I leave behind two things, the Qur'an and the Sunnah and if you follow these you will never go astray." The responsibility to know was placed directly on us.

    Like all Mothers, my Mother taught me responsibility, she said, "if you do wrong, you alone will get punished and not your brother who might have instigated you, it is not what he said, but it is how you respond that matters to me". She would invariably add, "On the Day of Judgment, you stand alone, there will be no one for you, as each one will be busy in reflecting his or her own deeds."

    The Qur'an repeatedly reinforces the paramount principle of faith: "O You who believe, on you rests (the responsibility) of your souls"(Q5:105) and (Q53:38), "that no bearer of burdens shall be made to bear another's burden." The picture was clear to me.

    I don't wish this for others, but the best thing that has ever happened to me was walking away from Islam and Quraan when I was 15. I made the same mistake that every maligner of Islam makes; reading the wrong translations of Quran and blaming the religion for it. After 30 years of searching for the truth on my own as the Prophet had advised "to read the book", I found the truth. Islam is an inclusive faith, it is about co-existence, it is a faith that appreciates all of God's creation and urges one to respect the otherness of others (Quran 109:6) without having to agree, it explicitly says (Quraan 49:13), that all of us are his creation, created to be different, and that we have to learn about each other to mitigate the conflicts and nurture goodwill. Today, I am proud to be a believer, not a blind one, but a critical believer in Islam.
    The Critical thinking has given me inordinate confidence to the point of challenging Pastor Jeffress in Dallas, that if he finds three faults in Quraan, I will convert to his faith, and if he cannot, all I asked of him was to become a blessed peacemaker and work with me in mitigating conflicts and building a cohesive America, where all of us can aspire to live without the fear of the other. He backed off as we returned the bad challenge with the request to reason and finding the truth. We held a Quraan Conference with ten Non Muslim Clergy on the panel and four Muslims including Imam Zia Shaikh, Dr. Basheer Ahmed, Imam Shakoor and Brother Hamid Shaikh, and I moderated the event. A full accounting of the event, including media interviews and the program is recorded in details at  www.QuraanConference.com
    When you have an issue with your spouse and child, you don't scream and shut them down; the problem will not go away unless you face it and solve the issue. When people accept the solutions willingly, we will have peace. Isn't that Islam is all about, freedom?
    Indeed, we must gracefully respond to every criticism of Quraan, Islam and the Prophet and I have the patience to welcome it.
    Aren't we supposed to learn and know each other to mitigate conflicts and create the kingdom of heaven right here on the earth, while waiting to go the next heaven? Didn't God say, the best among you is the one who learns about the other (49:13), so the myths, phobias and fears can be dismantled?
    I urge fellow Muslims to open to all the criticism with confidence, don't shut it, and let freedom of speech be the corner stone of Islam. Islam stands on its own; it does not need our defense, and it is silly to protect God or the Prophet, they are not weaklings or our property to protect, they belong to the whole universe, don't they?
    Muhammad Yunus, a Muslim thinker and a writer at New Age Islam responds,   "Doesn't the Qur'an repetitively say, "repel evil with good" (13:22, 23:96, 41:34). Shouldn't you take the opportunity to demonstrate the good in your faith and remove the cloud of hatred that is forming by the twin growing menaces of the day: Islamophobia and Radicalization? Inscribe on the facade of your mosques in bold and golden letters, the verses of the Qur'an that demonstrate the divine scheme on religious pluralism - 2:62, 2:136, 4:124, 5:69, 22:17, 64:9, 65:11 for example.

    Tell the believing world by visual display on billboards at all Islamic centers that the divine Light is lit in all places of pure worship (24:35) and God's name is proclaimed regularly in monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques (22:40). Inform the atheist and all categories of non-believers that they all are recipients of a portion of divine spirit (15:29, 32:7-9, 38:72) and God will judge them as well along with the believing humanity (22:17). Tell the whole world that however they demonize our Prophet, we must ignore them as this is an article of faith for us (6:112, 25:31).
    Dr. Tariq Cheema of World Congress of Muslim Philanthropists, adds another point of view, "the Muslim scholars and intellectuals around the world must rise to the challenge and offer guidance to the faith-loving masses on how to encounter the exploitation of freedom of speech, which is often quite provocative and insulting. On the other hand every one must strive for a legislation that guards the sanctity of all religions and their Prophets, scriptures, and symbols alike."
    Prioritizing Sunnah
    The most important Sunnah (Prophet's example) and the first Sunnah is to be the Amin; the trust worthy (81:21), the truth teller and someone who mitigates conflicts and nurtures good will for the peaceful coexistence of his or her neighbors, communities, tribes and nations.
    That was the first example of Muhammad (pbuh) to be a good citizen, wasn't it? Wasn't that the first model prophet had set up for one to follow? Mind you, he was called Amin by non-Muslims. Shouldn't we start with the same first foot forward? To be good citizens, whether in Pakistan, America, Saudi Arabia, China or Indonesia, we have to earn it by being a participant and a contributor towards the wellbeing of the nation. Your presence should relax others, and make them comfortable that you are a peacemaker and they can trust you for your fairness. Do you follow the Prophet?

    The second most important Sunna to follow is to be Rahmatul Aalameen (Mercy to mankind) (21:107). To be a Rahmat (Mercy) to fellow beings who are Atheist, Baha'i, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jain, Jewish, Sikh, Wicca, Natives, Zoroastrians and others, we must be kind to them, no one should be afraid or apprehensive of us. Should anyone be afraid of a Muslim, then we have not followed the Sunna of the prophet.
    Please note that I have stripped the title of Allama or Maulana from all the names above. We have a habit of placing individuals next to God, they are just like you and I, of course with more knowledge, sometimes real, and sometimes looped up. Practicing and rehearsing the same wrong thing over and over again does not make them perfect. We need to reserve the titles to the Prophets; all others must be referred to just by their names with utmost respect.
    We should not be loose with titles, unless they have shown that Allah is Rabbul Aaalamen (Universality of the Creator) and Muhammad is Rahmatul Aalameen in their actions and words. How many of them would qualify to be an Allama then?
    All other Sunna emanates from these two basic steps, clearly and unambiguously corroborated by the Qur'an (81:21, 21:107).
    We cannot compromise on free speech, however much a few may abuse it, but free speech is an enduring value and the hallmark of civilization. I believe in free speech and that is the only way societies will grow. As Muslims we need to seriously consider the gains Muslims have had, that far outweigh the tensions given by a handful of loonies.
    Islam is a universal inclusive faith, it is from Rabbul Aalameen (creator of the universe, its prophet is Rahmatul Aalameen (Mercy to mankind) and we should be Mukhlooqul Aalameen (Universal, all embracing beings). Islam is about goodness and not forcing others, and not domineering but co-existing, just as the Prophet did and proclaimed in the Madinah treaty. Islam is about appreciating everything God has created on this universe (55:16).
    If they curse the prophet, prophet is not going to be cursed, have the strength in your faith and return badness with Good; we know all the examples of his work. When you hear someone curse the prophet, just say I am sorry you feel that way, but if you wish to seek the truth, find it on your own or I will connect you with someone who can guide you, if you don't that is your choice and nothing will come off me or the prophet, your words do not have the power to reduce Islam or the prophet, I will pray peace of mind to you. 
    Don't feel compelled to convince anyone, let go. What did Allah say to Prophet when he was frustrated that people were not getting his message? You do your dharma (duty) and let them have the freedom to accept. Elsewhere God says there is no compulsion in matters of faith (2:256).
    Have confidence, read what is good in Islam and ignore the bad things others say, write, or put it in the film about Islam or its Prophet.  From the very first day of his mission, the Prophet was criticized and the Qur'an reviled and the criticism and revulsion only gained momentum through the medieval ages as Islam continued to win the hearts of other people. It has come to surface again with greater ferocity, but we the Muslims as peace makers must act peacefully.    
    Islam is not going anywhere, prophet is not going anywhere, and by opening up you will enjoy your Imaan (faith) immensely with genuine admiration for its wisdom. I thank Allah for helping me see the light and beauty of Islam, and you can too.
    Related Articles:
    • Huffington Post -Muslims don't get it http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-ghouse/freedom-of-speech-and-the-legitimacy-of-muslim-protests_b_1902427.html

    • Dallas Morning news -Separation of church and state http://theghousediary.blogspot.com/2012/09/texas-faith-is-separation-of-church-and.html

    • Dallas Morning news - right to free speech http://theghousediary.blogspot.com/2012/09/texas-faith-religion-and-right-to-free.html








    ABOUT MIKE GHOUSE
     ...............................................................................................................................
    Mike Ghouse is a
    speaker, thinker and a writer on pluralism,politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in Standing up for othersand has done that throughout his life as an activist. Mike has a presence on national and local TV, Radio and Print Media.  His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work through many links.





    Nearly 150 pieces on Pluralism at Dallas Morning News: http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/category/texas-faith/

    Nearly 100 pieces on Pluralism at Huffington Post:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-ghouse/

    Nearly 80 Appearances on Fox News with Sean Hannity :
    http://www.hannity.com/guest/ghouse-mike/10804

    Nearly 50 Pieces at Oped News :
    http://www.opednews.com/author/author9027.html

    Hundreds of Radio Shows.

    ..............................................................................................................................


    Dealing with Boko Haram - the abducters of nearly 300 school girls in Nigeria

    $
    0
    0
    DEALING WITH BOKO HARAM – THE ABDUCTERS OF 300 GIRLS IN NIGERIA
    URL - http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2014/05/dealing-with-boko-haram-abducters-of.html

    Education (western) is not acceptable to these men in Nigeria, and have abducted nearly 300 girls from schools and threatening to sell or do horrible things to them, it is painful to the parents. Education may just be a front, as it turns out they are willing to release the girls if Nigerian government releases certain prisoners that belong to the group. Here is another case of Taliban in development, are they beyond dialogue?

    The more we push them or Bush them, we would be essentially telling them to dig in their heels and stick to their position – Dialogue opens up opportunities with least damage and least cost. I have been thinking of going there and listening to them, perhaps take a Muslim delegation to have a dialogue


    Abubakar Shekau, chieftan of Boko Haram shamelessly says that he’s been instructed by God to do what he’s doing and that is, "“God instructed me to sell them, they are his properties and I will carry out his instructions”. How can anyone even believe that when in the Quran, Allah swt says:-

    “O you who believe! You are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should you treat them with harshness, that you may take away part of the dowry you have given them – except when they have become guilty of open lewdness. On the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If you take a dislike to them, it may be that you dislike something and Allah will bring about through it a great deal of good.” [Quran 4:19]|


    Your thoughts?

    Mike Ghouse
    www.MikeGhouse.net


    Below piece - Source unknown

    Who are Nigeria's Boko Haram Islamists?


    The mass abduction of almost 300 schoolgirls in Nigeria by the Islamic militant group Boko Haram has captured the attention of the nation, taken social media by storm and thrown the terror group directly into the forefront of the public's consciousness. But what is Boko Haram, and why is the group only making headlines now?

    Q What is Boko Haram?

    Boko Haram is a militant Islamist group based in the northeast of Nigeria, north Cameroon and Niger.

    The group's official name is Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati wal-Jihad, which in Arabic translates as: "People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad".

    Founded in 2001 by Mohammed Yusuf, Boko Haram, whose name means "Western education is forbidden" in the local Hausa language, began their insurgency in 2009 in Nigeria's Borno state.

    Now led by Abubakar Shekau after Yusuf was killed in 2009, the group is fighting to overthrow to government in order to create an Islamic state and promotes a version of Islam which makes it "haram" for Muslims to partake in political or social activity associated with Western society.

    Since its insurgency began, Boko Haram has carried out increasingly deadly attacks on schools, pupils and teachers in the mainly Muslim north of Nigeria.

    Q What is the current situation?

    On 14 April, 276 girls aged between 16 and 18 were kidnapped from the Government Girls Secondary School in rural Chibok, in the north-eastern Borno state. Boko Haram later claimed responsibility for the abductions in a video, where Shekau threatened to sell the girls as slaves and marry them off because "God instructed me to sell them, they are his properties and I will carry on his work."

    A further eight school girls were abducted from a Nigerian village by the group this week. Many fear some of the girls have already been trafficked into neighbouring neighbouring Chad and Cameroon.

    Q Is this the first time such an attack has taken place?

    No. Boko Haram has stepped up its campaign against Western education in recent years and most recently attacked a boarding school in Yobe, where gunman killed 59 pupils in February. In September 2013, the group killed 44 male students and teachers during a night-time raid at an agricultural college in the state.

    Q Why is Boko Haram's insurgency suddenly attracting so much attention?

    Social media appears to be a driving force behind the world-wide attention focused on this particular attack, with many media-friendly celebrities using the hashtag #bring back our girls on Twitter to raise awareness. Oscar-winning actress Anne Hathaway recently used the hashtag to lead a demonstration in America calling for their safe return, while Angelina Jolie used the premiere of her latest film to condemn the abduction as "an unthinkable cruelty".

    Q What is the #bring back our girls hashtag and how did it start?

    The 'bring back our girls' hashtag was first used by Nigerian lawyer in Abuja, Ibrahim M Abdullahi, who tweeted the call during a speech by the vice-president of the World Bank for Africa. The hashtag was quickly adopted by desperate mothers of the missing girls who would write it on placards during protests, before high profile celebrities, including Michelle Obama posted images holding cards reading #bringbackourgirls.

    Q How has it made an impact? 

    The hashtag has been tweeted more than one million times since it began trending two weeks ago. It appears to be keeping the abduction in the public eye, but its effectiveness has become a point of debate. Many have argued simply tweeting a hashtag will not assist the search efforts for the missing girls, while others have accused famous figures of exploiting the campaign and using it to generate self-publicity.

    Q Why are world leaders becoming involved?

    World leaders have appeared reluctant to intervene in Boko Haram's activities despite the many atrocities the group have claimed responsibility for in the past.

    But this well-publicised attack has seen the international community step forward and very publicly offer their assistance in the search.

    The US has agreed to send a team of up to 10 military personnel comprising experts in logistics, communications and intelligence planning, to join State Department and Justice Department officers and British SAS liaison officers are understood to be already in Abuja, where they are looking at ways to assist rescue efforts.

    But some have argued rescuing the children should be the responsibility of Nigerian leader Goodluck Jonathan, who has been widely-criticised for failing to take the girls' predicament seriously until domestic and international pressure forced him to do so some two weeks after the 14 April incident.

    Others have criticised countries for not sending more support. Parents of the missing school girls have pleaded with world leaders to send more help in order to locate their missing children. One mother, Shettima Haruma, said parents need "the government to get American people to come and help us".

    "We beg Nigerians, those in another country like America or (Britain) ... it's three weeks, nearly one month ... (and we haven't) seen any letters from our daughters," Ms Haruma told Sky News.

    Texas Faith: Boko Haram, false prophets and phony messiahs

    $
    0
    0
    The Muslims around the world have avoided their responsibility in asking Mr. Shekau to have a conversation and acknowledge what God says in multiple verses in Quran including 4:19 (Asad translation), “O YOU who have attained to faith! It is not lawful for you to [try to] become heirs to your wives [by holding onto them] against their will; and neither shall you keep them under constraint with a view to taking away anything of what you may have given them, unless it be that they have become guilty, in an obvious man¬ner, of immoral conduct. …” These are innocent girls this man is holding against their will.

    URL - http://theghousediary.blogspot.com/2014/05/texas-faith-boko-haram-false-prophets.html


    Mike Ghouse


    Texas Faith: Boko Haram, false prophets and phony messiahs
    By Rudolph Bush | rbush@dallasnews.com | 10:45 am on May 13, 2014 | Permalink

    Girls abducted from the northeastern town of Chibok, Nigeria (AP Photo)

    In Nigeria, a nation awaits the fate of 276 girls kidnapped by the terrorist group Boko Haram. Like so many groups before it, this one is led by a man who claims direct contact with God. History is filled with false prophets and phony messiahs. Faith is twisted to justify the most horrible acts. What can believers in all parts of the world do to resist and challenge such people? And in our own part of the world, how do we separate the subtler difference between those who use faith for their own ends and those who are truly trying to bring us closer to God?


    Mike Ghouse, President, Foundation for Pluralism and speaker on interfaith matters, Dallas


    Poor Religion has been an easy target of blame for the evils men do, as if it is a tangible being that can be beat up, butchered, buried and put to rest. Myths are manufactured about “other religions” without any substantiation; it is an old business of maligning others to have a variety of gains, but messing up the long term cohesiveness of the societies, thus each one of us.

    Finding the truth is our own responsibility, as it brings relief to each one of us, and removes fears and prejudices towards the others. Indeed, that was the unwritten purpose of religion; to create societies where no one had to live in fear of the other. Isn’t that the bottom line of God’s will? As a society we have faltered in blaming the religion for the acts of individuals.

    Does blaming a religion mitigate the conflicts or aggravate them? Do we separate the subtler difference between those who use faith for their own ends, and those who are trying to do the right thing?


    A majority of people of faith shrink from the responsibility of speaking up, and instead flame the blame and mess up societal harmony even further. I will share two extreme examples of the brutes in a civilized society like ours and “developing societies like Nigeria” in this case.

    In 2009, the words of Pastor Robert Jeffress of the First Baptist Church of Dallas generated fear, anxieties hate and ill-will, it was him and not the reflection of his Church, even if the congregation sheepishly clapped and gave a standing ovation in the Church when the pastor said, “Islam is an evil evil religion and Quraan is a book written by a false prophet” with full passion. The religious clergy of different faiths in Dallas did the right thing, they spoke up and together we held a conference on Quran led by this panelist of Dallas Morning News, the story in video and print is captured at www.QuraanConference.com in its entirety.

    Going to the “lower end of the civility” (per bigots) in Nigeria , Abubakar Shekau the Chief of Boko Haram shamelessly said that, “God instructed me to sell them (the 276 girls), they are his properties and I will carry out his instructions.” Like Pastor Jeffress he has duped his congregation and the world to believe that it is his religion that made him do or say the the wrongs.

    The Muslims around the world have avoided their responsibility in asking Mr. Shekau to have a conversation and acknowledge what God says in multiple verses in Quran including 4:19 (Asad translation), “O YOU who have attained to faith! It is not lawful for you to [try to] become heirs to your wives [by holding onto them] against their will; and neither shall you keep them under constraint with a view to taking away anything of what you may have given them, unless it be that they have become guilty, in an obvious man¬ner, of immoral conduct. …” These are innocent girls this man is holding against their will.

    Muslims rightfully claim that Prophet Muhammad was a mercy to the mankind, and he was the first law giver who liberated women from the clutches of men’s oppression, and declared that men and women are each other’s protectors, and a woman has a right to decide who she marries (1400 years ago, whereas she was considered a chattel in the west until a hundred years ago), and has the right to divorce and own her own property separately. Mr. Shekau is going against the prophet, and it needs to be called out.

    The first word revealed to the Prophet was “Learn” and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had famously said, “Learn, even if you have to go to China to learn, do it, learning is important, “he further beefed it up by adding that a woman’s education is a must, as she must willingly sign the marriage or a business contract and that obviously required education. Mr. Shekau on the other hand believes education for girls is evil.

    The more we push them, we essentially tell them to dig in. Dialogue opens up opportunities with least damage and least cost. On our part in the west, we have failed to communicate to the world that our education system is designed to deliver good for the society at large. It is necessary for us to learn and share about each other in a world of increasing conflicts to mitigate conflicts and nurture goodwill. Pluralism is the way forward; that is respecting the otherness of others and accepting the God given uniqueness.


    To read the other panelists point of view, please go to Dallas Morning News at: http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/2014/05/texas-faith-boko-haram-false-prophets-and-phony-messiahs.html/#more-39000

    ...............................................................................................................................
    Mike Ghouse is a speaker, thinker and a writer on pluralism
    , politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in Standing up for others and a book with the same title is coming up. Mike has a strong presence on national and local TV, Radio and Print Media. He is a frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on Fox TV, and a commentator on national radio networks, he contributes weekly to the Texas Faith Column at Dallas Morning News; fortnightly at Huffington post; and several other periodicals across the world. His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work through many links.

    A Response to the Question: “Why Aren’t Muslims Condemning Boko Haram?”

    $
    0
    0

    It's time we ask a different question.

    Courtesy Time

    As a leader in the Muslim community, just about every time a crazy Muslim or group of Muslims do something insane in the world, I am asked or prominently hear this question being asked, “Why aren’t Muslims condemning this?!” The latest example of this is calls to condemn the cult known as “Boko Haram” in Nigeria who have kidnapped 300 girls.
    Well, there are two problems with the questions itself – and both are based on false premises. First is the assumption that Muslims have not, in fact, condemned other violent extremist Muslims. This is simply untrue. Muslim religious scholars, intellectuals, activists, organizations, and countries have all condemned Boko Haram and the kidnappings in unison. All you have to do to know this is type in google search “Muslims condemn Boko Haram” and articles will abound.

    The second problem with the question of why Muslims, supposedly, don’t condemn evil actions from other Muslims requires a bit more explanation. The problem with it is this inherent assumption that somehow radical violent extremist cults can legitimately speak for Islam – one of the great world religions whose contributions to civilization over the course of fourteen-hundred plus years speaks for itself (Just browse through 1001 Muslim Inventions online if you have your doubts). And, that if Muslims don’t come out and spend all of their remaining days on earth condemning evil at the hand of other Muslims, then somehow this inherent assumption becomes true.

    It’s true that Muslims today suffer from a crisis of authority and the question of who speaks for Islam is not an easy question to answer. But, rest assured that this does not mean that Muslims are operating under some sort of Wild, Wild West where everything and anything goes. Muslims have a divinely revealed scripture, established teachings from the Prophet Muhammad, and a system of morals and ethics that have guided the majority of Muslims to live purposefully and righteously in the world.

    Now, the problem with the second problematic assumption is that in the West, today, we continue to grapple with age old misinformation and biases about Islam and Muslims that have resulted in deep seated fear and mistrust. This began way before the travesty and tragedy of 9/11. It begins centuries earlier when Muslims and Christians were engaged in bloody wars and competition for power. The rallying cries for war were couched, naturally, in propaganda against Islam’s prophet, scripture, and way of life as just evil and worthy of destruction. Even though we would like to think of ourselves as much more educated and enlightened today – and, I think we are, in some ways – the impact of old propaganda cannot be wished away. Indeed, much of this propaganda is to be found in a lot of works by Orientalists up to the present time – albeit, often, in much subtler ways. It takes intellectual courage and independent thinking to think about Islam and Muslim history through new lenses.

    This historic bias has too often led to Muslims simply being written out of the books across academic disciplines in the West – unless it reinforces the bias. Even in universities when we study science, philosophy, law and ethics, and even world history – Islam and the contributions of Muslims rarely gets much attention. Muslim intellectual history and discourse is just assumed to be irrelevant. Some of this is just the problem of an ethno-centric educational system and worldview, but a lot of it is deeper than that.

    All of this, then, results in seeing Muslims as exotic, as the other, as belonging to a different civilization and ethos. Thus, Muslim Americans, for example, are always asked about condemning evil in some foreign land which is largely beyond their control and sphere of influence, but rarely thought of as equal partners for building coalitions against injustices right here at home.

    A lot of this is the fault of Muslims. We constantly buy into the narrative rather than producing our own narrative. And, we are often quick to condemn injustice “over there” and act like we don’t give a damn care in the world when injustices happen at home. Just think of the Trayvon Martin tragedy and the painful silence of too many Muslim organizations and public figures. Think of the gross injustices of the prison industrial complex and how rarely that becomes a point of concern in Muslim circles. And, the list can go on. Too many Muslims have accepted their social categorization as the “other” despite a lot of talk about being American and proud of it. It’s time for us to own issues domestically as much as we do internationally if we are serious and want to be taken seriously.

    The Prophet Muhammad said that when you encounter an injustice you must try to prevent it with your own actions; if you cannot, then with your words; and if you cannot, then to at least to hate it within your heart.

    In part, when Muslims are asked to constantly condemn or do something about what’s happening abroad, it is an attempt, consciously or subconsciously, for us as a society to shift our focus from some of the ugliness we have to confront when we look into our own mirror. It’s much easier, especially in this age of globalization, to spend our waking hours following the latest news on the kidnapped girls in Nigeria than it is to confront our own problems with sex slavery, rape, and pornofication of women right here at home. It’s more convenient to ask why Muslims are killing each other in places like Iraq and Afghanistan than to admit that we’ve completely failed generations of young Americans whose lives are scarred by inner-city gang violence everyday in this country. And, it’s more comforting to shake our heads at terrorists who kill at random than to condemn our own government for the use of drones that have killed innocents – including children – and have taken it in their own hands to be judge, jury, and executioner in this elusive war on terrorism.

    So, let’s remember, the next time we want to point our finger and ask why someone else isn’t doing something to condemn or stop evil in the world, there are four fingers pointing right back at us. And, the next time we want to shake our head and condemn Muslims for not condemning other Muslims, let’s pause and ask a different question: “What can I do to work with Muslims against all of the injustices in the world I live in?”

    Sohaib Sultan is the Muslim chaplain at Princeton University and directs the university’s Muslim Life Program in the Office of Religious Life. He is the author of The Koran for Dummies (Wiley, 2004) and The Qur’an and Sayings of the Prophet Muhammad: Selections Annotated and Explained (Skylight Paths, 2007).


    Muslims have to take the responsibility to fix Boko Haram and other extremist groups

    $
    0
    0
    We cannot push or bush the extremists to dig in their heels and stick to their positions. Dialogue opens up opportunities with least damage and least cost. I have been thinking of taking a Muslim delegation to Nigeria. Mr. Abubakar Shekau of Boko Haram and his likes need to be included in a conversation and asked to explain the sources of his claims. Neither Quran nor Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) support his actions. He is holding innocent girls against their will.


    URL -http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2014/05/muslims-have-to-take-responsibility-to.html


    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    1 2 
    http://www.prlog.org/12323055-kidnapped-nigerian-school-girls.jpg
    Kidnapped Nigerian school girls
    May 13, 2014 - DALLAS -- Finding the truth is our own responsibility, as it brings relief to each one of us and removes fears and prejudices towards the others. Indeed, that is the unwritten purpose of religion; to create societies where no one had to live in fear of the other. Isn’t that the bottom line of God’s will? As a society we have faltered in blaming the religion for the acts of individuals.

    A majority of people of faith shrink from the responsibility of speaking up, and instead flame the blame and mess up societal harmony even further. Here are two extreme examples of the brutes in a civilized society like ours and “developing societies like Nigeria” in this case.

    In 2009, the words of Pastor Robert Jeffress of the First Baptist Church of Dallas generated fear, anxieties hate and ill-will, it was him and not the reflection of his Church, even if the congregation sheepishly clapped and gave a standing ovation in the Church when the pastor said, “Islam is an evil evil religion and Quraan is a book written by a false prophet” with full passion. The religious clergy of different faiths in Dallas did the right thing, they spoke up and together we held a conference on Quran led by Mike Mohamed Ghouse of the World Muslim Congress, the story in video and print is captured at www.QuraanConference.com in its entirety.

    Going to the “lower end of the civility” (per bigots) in Nigeria , Abubakar Shekau the Chief of Boko Haram shamelessly said that, “God instructed me to sell them (the 276 girls), they are his properties and I will carry out his instructions.”
    Like Pastor Jeffress he has duped his congregation and the world to believe that it is his religion that made him do or say the the wrongs.

    The Muslims around the world have avoided their responsibility in asking Mr. Shekau to have a conversation and acknowledge what God says in multiple verses in Quran including 4:19 (Asad translation)
    , “O YOU who have attained to faith! It is not lawful for you to [try to] become heirs to your wives [by holding onto them] against their will; and neither shall you keep them under constraint with a view to taking away anything of what you may have given them, unless it be that they have become guilty, in an obvious man¬ner, of immoral conduct. …” These are innocent girls, and this man is holding them against their will.

    Muslims rightfully claim that Prophet Muhammad was a mercy to the mankind, and he was the first law giver who liberated women from the clutches of men’s oppression, and declared that men and women are each other’s protectors, and a woman has a right to decide who she marries (1400 years ago, whereas she was considered a chattel in the west until a hundred years ago), and has the right to divorce and own her own property separately. Mr. Shekau is going against the prophet, and it needs to be called out.

    The first word revealed to the Prophet was “Learn” and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had famously said, “Learn, even if you have to go to China to learn, do it, learning is important, “he further beefed it up by adding that a woman’s education is a must, as she must willingly sign the marriage or a business contract and that obviously required education. Mr. Shekau on the other hand believes education for girls is evil.

    Pluralism is the way forward; that is respecting the otherness of others and accepting the God given uniqueness. Freedom of consciene and speech are the golden rules of civil societies, and Islam emphasizes that there is no compulsion in religion.

    The more we push them, we essentially tell them to dig in. Dialogue opens up opportunities with least damage and least cost. On our part in the west, we have failed to communicate to the world that our education system is designed to deliver good for the society at large. It is necessary for us to learn and share about each other in a world of increasing conflicts to mitigate and to  nurture goodwill. We had a successful event in Florida when Pastor Jones wanted to burn 3000 copies of Quran, full report at www.WorldMuslimCongress.com

    Poor Religion has been an easy target of blame for the evils men do, as if it is a tangible being that can be beat up, butchered, buried and put to rest. Blaming religions does not do any good, its like barking at the wrong tree, but getting to the individuals and having a conversation with them increased the chances of building cohesive societies.

     
    Media Contact
    Mike Mohamed Ghouse
    (214) 325-1916
    MikeGhouse@aol.com


    ...............................................................................................................................
    Mike Ghouse is a speaker, thinker and a writer on pluralism
    , politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in Standing up for others and a book with the same title is coming up. Mike has a strong presence on national and local TV, Radio and Print Media. He is a frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on Fox TV, and a commentator on national radio networks, he contributes weekly to the Texas Faith Column at Dallas Morning News; fortnightly at Huffington post; and several other periodicals across the world. His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work through many links.

    Jewish scholar lectures on 'How Islam Saved the Jews,' at UAB on April 24

    $
    0
    0
    David J. Wasserstein, a professor of Jewish History at Vanderbilt University, will lecture on “How Islam Saved the Jews” at 7 p.m. on Thursday, April 24, at the University of Alabama in Birmingham.
    The free, public lecture will take place at UAB’s Volker Hall, Lecture Room A, 1670 University Blvd. The event is co-sponsored by the UAB Department of History and the Birmingham Islamic Society.
    "It's a chance for Jews and Muslims who are now often at odds politically to reflect on our glorious historical past and for a moment forget about our political differences, and work on future peace," said Ashfaq Taufique, president of the Birmingham Islamic Society.

    Wasserstein will discuss how the spread of Islam after Muslims conquered Mecca in 630 A.D. led to a thriving Muslim culture that also allowed a thriving Jewish subculture, until about 1300 A.D.
    "Within a century of the death of Mohammad, in 632, Muslim armies had conquered almost the whole of the world where Jews lived, from Spain eastward across North Africa and the Middle East as far as the eastern frontier of Iran and beyond," Wasserstein wrote in The Jewish Chronicle. "Almost all the Jews in the world were now ruled by Islam. This new situation transformed Jewish existence. Their fortunes changed in legal, demographic, social, religious, political, geographical, economic, linguistic and cultural terms - all for the better."

    If not for the Muslim conquests, Jewish culture might have died out, Wasserstein believes.
    "The political unity brought by the new Islamic world-empire did not last, but it created a vast Islamic world civilization, similar to the older Christian civilization that it replaced," Wasserstein wrote in The Jewish Chronicle. "Within this huge area, Jews lived and enjoyed broadly similar status and rights everywhere. They could move around, maintain contacts, and develop their identity as Jews. A great new expansion of trade from the ninth century onwards brought the Spanish Jews - like the Muslims - into touch with the Jews and the Muslims even of India." 

    Wasserstein has written several books, including “The Rise and Fall of the Party-Kings, Politics and Society in Islamic Spain, 1002-1086” and “The Caliphate in the West; An Islamic Political Institution in the Iberian Peninsula” and he co-authored “The Legend of the Septuagint, From Classical Antiquity to Today.”
    Wasserstein received his Ph.D from Oxford University in 1982. His research interests include medieval Islamic history, medieval Jewish studies, Islam in Spain, Islamic numismatics and minorities in the Islamic world. With a background in classical studies, he is also interested in the classical tradition in Islam, and in particular in the ways in which Judaism, Islam and the classical world intersect culturally, linguistically, and politically.

    URL - http://www.al.com/living/index.ssf/2014/04/jewish_scholar_lectures_on_how.html

    Muslims for Satan

    $
    0
    0
    I am pleased to read this bold article, and as the civilization progresses, more and more members of humanity and Muslims will move out of darkness towards the light.  The following notes may be too advanced for many and may be afraid with the idea of being free. 

    Not only the orthodoxy among Muslims, but Christians, Jews and others have made a villain out of God – and have painted him as a hateful God towards others who do not subscribe to their specificities.

    Hell no! What God wants is his creation, all of it, remain intact and in harmony, and who ever subscribes to that idea  is a submitter to his will.

    This Muslim has stood up for the rights of  every one – from Atheists to Zoroastrian and everyone in between including LGBT, Animists, Pagans, Wicca and others.  If you are not willing to stand up for others, why should anyone stand up for you?

    When I stood up for the human rights of Gays and Lesbians, several Muslims had difficulty with it, but when Congressman Keith Ellison stood up, most of them learned to shut up.  Eventually, Muslim organizations are accepting the rights of Gays and Lesbians. The simpletons among us make the mistake of believing that we are encouraging homosexuality, that is the limitation of their thinking capacity. It is not about homosexuality, it is about the rights of individuals.

    All of us are created by God, and everyone has to have space, sustenance and nurturence to live his or her God given life. 

    Mike Ghouse
    # # #

    I appreciate the following two paragraphs of the author, and then the full article follows.

    It would be great if religions can always play nice. When they can’t, I am less concerned with Satanism’s alleged power to make Harvard unsafe for Catholics than the problem of big and powerful religions enforcing their privilege by stomping on small and powerless ones.
    As a Muslim, I have to support the Satanists. Public revulsion of Muslims in this country is so popular that I have no choice but to stand with religions that are marked as ugly, offensive, and intolerant. Rather than join the anti-Satanist outrage and try to convince Christians that Muslims deserve to be included as “children of Abraham” or whatever, I would suggest that Muslims take a radical stand on behalf of the religious freedoms that we claim for ourselves. The people who wish to insult Muslims are not members of ridiculed fringe groups. They are not just isolated Qur’an-burning pastors, but extraordinarily well-funded and networked activists. Islamophobia is so mainstream that as Muslims, we must support freedom for all marginalized religions, because too many people have marginalized us.
    # # #
    Muslims for Satan

    Following Catholic uproar, a proposed Satanic mass at Harvard has been canceled. The mass was going to be put on by the Satanic Temple, the group who also has plans to plant a Baphomet figure on the front lawn of the Oklahoma Statehouse. Despite the fact that the Harvard Extension School Cultural Studies Club dropped its sponsorship, the group still managed to have an unsanctioned "black mass" at Harvard Square's Hong Kong restaurant and lounge. What bothers me the most about the official quashing of the Satanic Temple's mass by Harvard is that it is being hailed as a victory for religious tolerance—it's not. Instead, it's a case of a small group getting bullied into submission because it offended a big religion. 
    In an editorial for the Harvard Crimson, Francis X. Clooney, Harvard professor and director of its Center for the Study of World Religions, expresses concern for what he calls this proposed “disconcerting incident.” He presents the elements in satanic ritual that invert and “blaspheme” Catholic sacraments as a potential slippery slope, asking, “What’s next? The endeavor ‘to learn and experience the history of different cultural practices’ might in another year lead to historical reenactments of anti-Semitic or racist ceremonies… or parodies that trivialize Native American heritage or other revivals of cultural and religious insult.”
    Clooney’s nightmare scenario ignores one important question, that of institutional privilege: While racism is an oppressors’ power play that always moves from the top down, Satanism critiques a target immeasurably more powerful than itself. For Catholics at Harvard to complain about Satanists offending them is like white people complaining about Louis Farrakhan’s “reverse racism.”
    In addition to his positions at Harvard, Clooney is also a Catholic priest. I know the history of Catholicism in America, and am sure that Clooney does as well. There was a time when Catholics were persecuted, reviled, and marked as the definitive “un-American” religion. Within the developing field of religious studies, the privileged position of liberal 19th-century Protestantism as “real” religion in its most evolved form also led to unfair anti-Catholic prejudice within the academy. Catholicism has struggled in the United States for recognition both as authentically Christian and authentically American.  
    Times have changed, so I’d like to tell Dr. Clooney how the American religious landscape looks in 2014. Dr. Clooney, I am a Muslim. As a Muslim in the cliché context of “post-9/11 America,” I encounter anti-Muslim discourses that use the same arguments that you have employed against Satanists. In more than one American city, Islamophobes have opposed the establishment of mosques by claiming that Muslims are intolerant and incapable of coexisting with other communities, or even that Islam is not a “real” religion and therefore cannot be entitled to the same defense of its freedoms. In the case of the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque,” people argued against the presence of a Muslim community simply on the basis that it would hurt their feelings. 
    As a Muslim, I have to support the Satanists. Public revulsion of Muslims in this country is so popular that I have no choice but to stand with religions that are marked as ugly, offensive, and intolerant. Rather than join the anti-Satanist outrage and try to convince Christians that Muslims deserve to be included as “children of Abraham” or whatever, I would suggest that Muslims take a radical stand on behalf of the religious freedoms that we claim for ourselves. The people who wish to insult Muslims are not members of ridiculed fringe groups. They are not just isolated Qur’an-burning pastors, but extraordinarily well-funded and networked activists. Islamophobia is so mainstream that as Muslims, we must support freedom for all marginalized religions, because too many people have marginalized us.
    I have no doubt that in his commitment to religious pluralism and interfaith understanding, Clooney supports the inclusion of Muslims as full participants in American life. His work in comparative theology, which focuses on dialogue between Catholicism and Hinduism, reveals great insight as to how we can be enriched by traditions that are not our own. Unfortunately, the projects of interfaith dialogue tend to privilege old religions over new ones, and big ones over small ones. Christian-Muslim dialogue, for example, isn’t typically going to invite Mormons or Ahmadiyya to the table. 
    In his treatment of Satanic mass, Clooney’s playing an authenticity game in which privileged religions get to name the terms by which something counts as “religion,” and respect for the sacred thus means respecting what privileged religions mark as sacred. I have seen this game played with destructive consequences for the Five Percenter community. In US prisons, Five Percenters have been historically denied the freedoms of conscience and assembly that are routinely protected for adherents to other traditions. 
    Warith Deen Mohammed, one of the most important Sunni leaders in American Muslim history, endorsed the prison industry’s characterization of Five Percenters as a “dangerous” and “corrupt” group. Incarcerated Five Percenters have been thrown into solitary confinement for no other reason than their personal conviction. Their right to assemble has been taken from them and the lessons that they study have been designated as contraband. Outside of the prison system, Five Percenters have been occasionally denied the right to change their legal names to Allah, with at least one judge stating that for a man to name himself Allah is inappropriate and even blasphemous.
    In prejudice against Five Percenters from both Muslims and non-Muslims, broader US Islamophobia, and Clooney’s attack on the Harvard black mass, we find the same mistake: A general failure to ask these people what their outrageous, offensive beliefs, and behaviors actually mean to them. Reducing the Satanic mass to a parody of the Catholic mass, he assumes that the Satanists involved must have no personal conviction that might endow the act with meaning, and discusses the act without any engagement of the human beings for whom it matters.  In his editorial, they remain faceless, nameless, and voiceless.
    So who are these people? The Satanists involved in the canceled black mass do not believe in Satan as a supernatural entity. 
    For the Satanic Temple, Satan is more of a singular embodiment of their mission to advocate religious tolerance and pluralism. For them, the black mass is a kind of protest against the oppressiveness of religion. Despite the absence of a higher power, the radical atheism they practice is a religious conviction and no less entitled to public expression or ritual performance than the positions of the “one true church.” 
    Clooney justifies his concern by pointing out that the black mass might be hurtful to a “living faith practice celebrated each day in congregations that include Harvard faculty, staff, and students.” In an official statement on behalf of the university, Harvard president Drew Faust expressed an intention to attend a Eucharistic Benediction at St. Paul’s Church on campus “in order to join others in reaffirming our respect for the Catholic faith at Harvard and to demonstrate that the most powerful response to offensive speech is not censorship, but reasoned discourse and robust dissent.” For both Clooney and Faust, Catholicism’s dignity must be protected because Catholics have a place at Harvard, while Satanism gets casually reviled because of course, Satanists have no place. 
    What Clooney and Faust miss is that some of us find claims of Jesus Christ as the only means of salvation from eternal torture to be incredibly offensive. Any tradition whose advocates promise to be exclusive possessors of the capital-T “Truth” is going to bother someone. Should all religious discourse that claims supreme truth-making power over other religions disappear from the public? I get that Harvard Divinity School’s preferred religiosity tends to go soft in this regard: At Div School, folks don’t go much for the hellfire talk or claims of superiority. Maybe there’s a Div School version of Satanism that Clooney could go for. Or not, but who cares—Clooney’s personal taste does not provide the measurement of Satanism’s legitimacy. 
    It would be great if religions can always play nice. When they can’t, I am less concerned with Satanism’s alleged power to make Harvard unsafe for Catholics than the problem of big and powerful religions enforcing their privilege by stomping on small and powerless ones. This is where Clooney gets it wrong in a big way. There has never been—and I am guessing that there will never be—an openly self-identified Satanist with Clooney’s institutional power at Harvard. Because I care about religious freedom not only for the center, but also the margins, count this Muslim with the Satanists. 
    Michael Muhammad Knight graduated from Harvard with a Master of Theological Studies (MTS) degree in 2011, and is presently a PhD student in Islamic Studies at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill. He is the author of nine books, including Tripping with Allah: Islam, Drugs, and Writing. Follow Michael on Twitter.

    Sharia Talk in Dallas

    $
    0
    0
    Sunday, May 18, 2014- Dallas, Texas ::  It was healthy a conversation led by Sharia Expert Hasan Mahmud and the Moderator Mike Ghouse.

    Both are on the board of World Muslim Congress, a think tank to bring out the Islam as it was meant to be – a system to bring about harmony and social co

    The discussion involved, and for the sake of record, we have taped 8 videos on each topic.

    1.  Mohamed Morsi and Sharia Law
    2.  Radicalism free Villages – 20 Villages with sign boards welcoming visitors
    3.  Maududi’s Sharia
    4.  Slavery in Islam
    5. Apostasy
    6. Summary
    7. Hope for future and human rights
    8. Reform trend.

    Hasan Mahmud is one of the leading experts on Sharia in North America, and like all great scholars, his knowledge comes from years of pondering over the miseries inflicted on women through the mis-use and abuse of Sharia by typical men.  He has written books on Sharia and made three films about it.

    Mike Ghouse on the other hand had walked away from Islam for nearly 30 years of his life for precisely mistranslations and mis-interpretations of Quran and the unjust Sharia laws as practiced. Then in the late nineties he studied Quran, Islam and the Prophet critically and chose to become a Muslim and has created a site on Sharia and extensive sites on Islam and other topics.

    Sharia, its genesis, its example and where did we go wrong in keeping a few between Hasan Mahmud, one of the leading Sharia experts in North America who appreciates the

    Whether you are a theist, atheist or an agnostic, you may see the element of balance embedded in every aspect of creation be it matter, life or environment.  The earth rotates on its own imaginary axis and circles the sun with precision, and so do the other planets in the universe. When it comes to seasons it appears that, they are programmed to be within a range of prediction. No matter where you sow the tiny seed of wheat, the process is predetermined as to what happens to that seed, so is the human body, one wrong food can mess up that balance. Everything about the nature is balance, precision and harmony.

    What does the process (God) that created matter and life want? I believe it wants us to maintain that balance and harmony for our continued existence, it’s our freedom and ability to tune ourselves and our environment to constantly maintain that balance that gives us life. 

    What does God really want? Like a mother who wants her kids to do well; like the teacher who wants his students to score A’s, like a chef who wants all her patrons to enjoy her food, like the maker of iPhone who wants all its customers to enjoy the phone to its max benefit, God wants all his creation (life, matter and environment) to function effectively and in harmony and cohesion as he has created. That can be called God’s will and subscribing to that thought can be called submission (Quran), surrender (Bhagvad Gita) or follow (Bible) the creator.

    Ever since our conscious life began, there have been a number of individuals from among us, who have worked hard to keep God’s will. The purpose of every religious or non-religious leader was create such societies where no one had to live in fear of the other, or no one was to be pushed out of harmony.

    Religion is a beautiful instrument with a purpose to maintain the social cohesiveness among the inhabitants, a majority of people get that right, a few don’t, and those who don’t,  don’t realize that they are working against the balance without being aware of it.

    Justice is the one word that wraps God, balance, harmony and cohesion together and that is the foundation of all societies, without justice, things go awry and if not checked, they will degenerate from there. Krishna had mentioned whenever there is adharma (righteousness turned upside down), someone will appear from among us to fix it and Quran talks about God sending a peacemaker/prophet to every tribe to restore trust and harmony in a given society.

    S H A R I A

    Each society, civil or religious has its own code of conduct that it operates on. Islam is no different. Sharia in its simplest form is a how-to-serve-justice manual based on the Qur'an and the Hadith (Prophet Muhammad's sayings and life examples). Indeed, it is a human effort to understand the concept of justice enshrined in Qur'an for the day-to-day living. Sharia like all other human laws, including the laws of the United States has its own shortcomings when it comes to just applications of the law. However, the world has evolved* but Sharia has a few frozen lakes.

    American Muslims have placed their trust in the American justice system and will continue to oppose the kind of Sharia "that is prevalent in a handful of Muslim majority nations across the globe". The right wingers are duping Americans to believe that Muslims want that kind of Sharia law here in America, they are wrong, no Muslim organization in America has asked for it, none.  I will be one of the first ones, if not thefirst one, to stand up against Sharia for public, however, I support Sharia for personal use of people to square off their conflicts. We are Americans and the law of the land is our law. There is no substitute for it.

    # ##

    ...............................................................................................................................Hasan Mahmud :: A music and literary talent, Hasan researched deeply on Sharia la for decades and produced websites, books and docu-movies on Sharia law to create awareness in Muslim societies about its deadly impact. Hasan is :-

        Member, Advisory Board, World Muslim Congress
        Member, American Islamic Leadership Coalition (AILC)
        Canada-representative, Free Muslims Coalition
        Former president and director of Sharia Law, Muslim Canadian Congress
        Research Associate, Deen Research Institute, Holland
        2 Books, 3 Docu-Movies, numerous debates and hundreds of articles and media      
        interviews on Sharia law

    See more at: http://www.hasanmahmud.com/2012/index.php/about-hm#sthash.DDVVnKFI.dpuf
    ...............................................................................................................................
    Mike Ghouse is a speaker, thinker and a writer on pluralism
    , politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in Standing up for others and a book with the same title is coming up. Mike has a strong presence on national and local TV, Radio and Print Media. He is a frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on Fox TV, and a commentator on national radio networks, he contributes weekly to the Texas Faith Column at Dallas Morning News; fortnightly at Huffington post; and several other periodicals across the world. His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work through many links.

    Wife beating is a culture of Men and not Islam, Quran 4:34

    $
    0
    0
    This thing keeps popping up every few months and I am happy to review and share another point of view. Finding the truth is your own responsibility.

    Cultures determine one's behavior rather than the religion, indeed, religions are the product of environment; God says in Bhagvad Gita, "whenever unrighteousness takes over the society, I will emerge among you and reset the society to righteousness" and the Qur'aan, " to every nation, and to every tribe, there will be a messenger to put them back on the path of righteousness" and that's precisely what Jesus and Moses did; bring a sense of morality to the deviousness that preceded them.

    Religion is about justice, inclusiveness and common goodness.

    Basam writes in his research paper, “A common criticism exists that Islam is an anthropocentric religion that authorizes the oppression of women both in public and private spheres. Wife beating is often cited to support this claim.”

    Thanks to the variations in translations, it shows us the limitations of human understanding, and challenges us to strive to grasp the whole truth. What was hitherto cut and dry is no more. May be it is Allah's hint to us to get closer to understanding the truth. The monopolies would be gone and focus would be on the essence rather than literal meaning. Presently the 14 translations are available and Insha Allah it will be at http://www.worldmuslimcongress.com/ soon.
    .Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar offers another meaning to the translation of the Arabic word "Idrib," traditionally translated as "beat," which has been mis-understood and abused over the centuries by men who would be abusive any way, whether they are Muslim or not. "Why choose to interpret the word as 'to beat' when it can also mean 'to go away' - either one from the other, may be it meant separation as a process of re-evaluation.

    The passage is generally translated: "And as for those women whose ill will you have reason to fear, admonish them; then leave them alone in bed; then beat them; and if thereupon they pay you heed, do not seek to harm them. Behold, God is indeed most high, great!"

    Instead, Bakhtiar suggests "Husbands at that point should submit to God, let God handle it -- go away from them and let God work His Will instead of a human being inflicting pain and suffering on another human being in the Name of God."

    Insha Allah, I am working on presenting a paper on the myth of "wife beating" to our scholars and Imams to review, and if it is consistent with the essence of Qur'aan and if they concur, it will be a relief to the Muslim women around the world consistent with God being a just God.

    I am optimistic with this particular development and welcome this new translation, even if it has a few flaws, it would wash off by the 15 other translations, but will take us closer to the essence of Qur'aan; Justice to one and all.


    Woman re-interprets Qur’an

    Sometimes, our faithfulness to our understanding of anything in life makes us eager to reject any other expression, and prevents us from enlightening ourselves. We assume that seeing a different point of view is being disloyal, it is not. Islam is consistent in advising us to learn, whether from Romans or going as far away as China, we have to learn and we have to be open to learning.

    First of all, we welcome this new additional translation of Qur'aan. In the spirit of learning, and learning well, the alternatives available to us will simply open up our up minds to understand the concept of Justness in God's word in every aspect of life.

    There was a time when most of the non-Arabic speaking Muslims (>75%) relied on translation in English or other languages, what was given to us, was all we knew. We did not know how close the translations reflected the values of Qur'aan, but that was the only source available to us one time. We also had translations where due to the inadequate comprehension of the audience, certain words were injected into the translations to explain the meaning of the terms. People have taken that literally and some people have been hurt with these unintended wrong translations. (Apology and Qur'aan translations power point presentations at http://www.worldmuslimcongress.com/ )

    Indeed, when Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) made the knowledge available to every human through the Qur'aan, he meant for every one to read and understand it. It was common for the Prophet SAW to ask the Sahaba to think a bit before he told them the actual meaning of anything. He sometimes used to initiate a conversation by asking a question "Do you know what xyz means?" It was simply a means of encouraging the Sahaba to think.

    Thanks to the variations in translations, it shows us the limitations of human understanding, and challenges us to strive to grasp the whole truth. What was hitherto cut and dry is no more. May be it is Allah's hint to us to get closer to understanding the truth. The monopolies would be gone and focus would be on the essence rather than literal meaning.  

    Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar offers another meaning to the translation of the Arabic word "Idrib," traditionally translated as "beat," which has been mis-understood and abused over the centuries by men who would be abusive any way, whether they are Muslim or not. "Why choose to interpret the word as 'to beat' when it can also mean 'to go away' - either one from the other, may be it meant separation as a process of re-evaluation.

    Insha Allah, I am working on presenting a paper on the myth of "wife beating" to our scholars and Imams to review, and if it is consistent with the essence of Qur'aan and if they concur, it will be a relief to the Muslim women around the world consistent with God being a just God.

    I am optimistic with this particular development and welcome this new translation, even if it has a few flaws, it would wash off by the 15 other translations, but will take us closer to the essence.

    Discipline as a Means to Marital Reconciliation


    A common criticism exists that Islam is an androcentric religion that authorizes the oppression of women both in public and private spheres. Wife beating is often cited to support this claim. The perception that Islam permits a husband to beat his wife resides with some non-Muslims and Muslims alike. Acknowledging this perception, we explore in this paper the Islamic legal perspective on wife beating specifically and wife discipline in general.

    The primary source of legislation on wife discipline in Islamic law is verse 34 of the fourth chapter of the Qur’an entitled “the Women.” The verse presents the disciplinary scheme in the latter sentence of the verse—hereafter referred to as the “Discipline Passage.” The verse in whole reads: (Husbands) are the protectors and maintainers of their (wives) because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient and guard in (the husband’s) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to the women on whose part you fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them first, (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) spank them (lightly), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means of (annoyance): for Allah is Most High, Great (above you all).

    Continued: http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2008/01/wife-beating-434.html


    Wife beating Morale 4:34

    Surah 4:34 The (Wife) Beatings Will Continue 'til Morale Improves
    Principles of human dignity are timeless and universal, you say? Well, maybe, but consider the complexity of the therapist's task when a traditional Muslim husband and his not-so-traditional (Westernized) Muslim wife arrive in the office for marriage counseling and conciliation.

    Bassam A. Abed and Syed E. Ahmad's Discipline as a Means to Marital Reconciliation: the Husband's Graduated Response to His Wife's Disobedience Under Islamic Law explores "the Islamic legal perspective on wife beating specifically and wife discipline in general."

    Abed and Ahmad, law students at Michigan State University, dispute the suggestion that wife beating is an accepted doctrine of Islam, although they posit a notion of permissible, rightly motivated, non-abusive physical discipline as a means of restoring proper marriage relations. It is a very difficult concept for us Westerners to accept.

    Continued http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/2008/01/wife-beating-434.html



    The Muslim Responsibility

    God is about justice, justness and harmony, but a few men from Christian, Jewish, Hindu, and most certainly Islamic faith have interpreted a few verses to suit their manliness.  

    Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) instituted equal rights to women and men some 1400 years ago; remember that was not the case even in the west until 100 years ago. A woman could own her own business and property, initiate marriage and divorce, her signature was required to marry, meaning education was critical, she was even given the right to disobey her husband if he compels her to believe differently than what she believes in the matter of faith.  They sound like current day laws, but were lost in the Men’s culture for centuries. Thanks to America for leading the battle for equal rights, even we are not there yet, but together we all have to advance. Yes, we can do it.

    Muslims have a collective responsibility to undo the men-interpretation and bring in God’s justness and dignity to every human. All it takes is to put a white paper together by Muslim Scholars and Imams, get their consensus, and make a declaration (fatwa) and ask for endorsements from major Muslim organizations.  
     

    Thank you.

    Mike Ghouse
    (214) 325-1916 - text/talk
    www.MikeGhouse.net
     
    To be a Muslim is to be a peace maker, one who seeks to mitigate conflicts and nurtures goodwill for peaceful co-existence of humanity. Our work is geared towards building a cohesive society where no human has to live in apprehension or fear of the other. World Muslim congress is a think tank established in 2002 to bring Muslims of all denominations together, one small step at a time. If we can learn to respect the otherness of others and accept each other's uniqueness, then conflicts fade and solutions emerge.

    Memorial Day Reflections

    $
    0
    0
    It is a day of remembrance and reflection, it is time to pray for those have passed away, whether they are related to us or not. Let’s take a few moments to remember all those who have influenced, affected and cared for us, and those who cared for others whether we know them or not. It is an act that enriches our souls and brings humility and connects us back with ourselves.
     

    Please do not wish "Happy Memorial Day"– it ain’t, it is rather a day of reflection. Of course it may be nothing for you other than the weekend to relax, and that is fine too.
     
    You might find it meaningful to stop and say a prayer at one cemetery or the other, it is merely symbolic, and you don’t have to make an effort, just pull over on the road side of any cemetery and reflect on life for a few minutes.

     You don’t have to be religious to say a prayer – a prayer is merely “wishing goodness” to others. You may see it or not, we are all interconnected and the joy comes from seeing everyone connected is in harmony and peace. The idea of this prayer may be selfish, as we find ourselves some serenity.

    If you could, please pray for our men and women who gave up their lives to defend our freedom and safety that we cherish. There is a joy that accrues to you by expressing gratitude.

    My Grandfather had advised me to visit a cemetery or attend a funeral of a stranger to pay respects, and he added, for every wedding you attend, match it with attending a funeral or visiting a cemetery, he believed, it will straighten us out as humans, and I found that profound and enriching to the soul.

    Of course, you pray for the beloved ones every day, but this is a special day, the national day of remembrance and it would be nice, if we as a nation pray for the well being of all.

    I will take a few moments to remember all those who have influenced, affected and cared for me, and those who cared for others whether I knew them or not.

    There is a beautiful all inclusive prayer that most Muslims say almost every day – the gist of which is ; Dear God forgive me, forgive my parents, my relatives, my friends, my community,  those who are alive, and those who aren’t. By the way when we seek forgiveness, we are suggesting to ourselves to find relief from all the burdens we carry in our day to day life and cherish a few peaceful moments. May we all be at peace, Amen!

    Mike Ghouse is a motivational speaker and all his info is at www.MikeGhouse.net

    Indian Muslims welcome Narendra Modi's invitation to Nawaz Sharif

    $
    0
    0
    Indian Muslims have been forthright and have made the right statements. There is no need to fear, our democracy is far stronger than anyone. I am glad to read these statements. I have welcomed and congratulated Mr. Modi and hope he will steer the country in the right direction. More at www.MikeGhouse.net 
    # # #

    New Delhi: India's Prime Minister-designate Narendra Modi's gesture of inviting Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to his swearing-in ceremony has raised hopes of a long-lasting peace between the arch rivals among Muslims of this country. 

    In direct contrast to his election pitch - where he spoke of a toughened stand against Pakistan - Narendra Modi, by this single gesture, has given a delightfully unexpected turn to the diplomatic course in the region. As much as the gesture stunned the leadership across the border, it has aroused hope among the people in India and Indian Muslims, especially, are construing it as a portend of a happy turn of events.
    Muslims in India, the nation's largest minority, comprise 14 percent of its 1.2 billion people, and are the world's third largest Muslim population after Indonesia and Pakistan.
    Indian Muslims welcome Narendra Modi's invitation to Nawaz Sharif

    Muslims in India comprise 14 percent of its 1.2 billion people, and are the world's third largest Muslim population.

    "It's a very good step by Mr Modi. Although we can't expect all the festering wounds to heal overnight, but yes let me concede a very positive start has been made. We now hope that the issues between the two would also be solved in the near future," Maulana Jalaluddin Umari, president, Jamat-e-Islami Hind said.
    Equally upbeat is SQR Ilyas, a member of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board. "It's a very happy start to a new innings. The step is likely to improve relations. It reminds us of Atal Bihari Vajpayee's era when much headway was made in diplomacy with Pakistan," said Ilyas. 

    "Poor relations with Pakistan are in no one's interest. Both countries end up spending more than they normally should on defence, ruin bilateral trade and ultimately the common man suffers," Ilyas told IANS..
    The invitation has allayed fears, at least for the moment, that relations with Pakistan may deteriorate under the Modi regime. 

    "Only communication can bridge the gap. The invite is a very good step, whatever the fear mongers may try to portray it as. Now, Pakistan should address India's concerns and a healthy relationship should develop that promotes regional peace," proffered Kamal Farooqi, a prominent Muslim voice and former chairman, Delhi Minorities Commission. 

    The incumbent chairman of the Delhi Minorities Commission, Safdar H Khan, too sees the development as a welcome change. 

    "Both countries would benefit if good relations are maintained. In terms of trade, India can export machinery and edibles like tea to Pakistan that our neighbour is currently buying from other countries at a very high cost," Khan said. 

    However, amid the euphoria, some people are still sceptical about the durability of the dialogue process.
    "We can only hope that our relations with Pakistan would improve. But in the past we have seen that Pakistan does not stand by its resolve for too long. So let's not be too enthusiastic this time around," said Mahmood Madani of Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind. 

    "But yes, the gesture of extending an invite to the Pakistan prime minister should be appreciated," he said.

    Courtesy - IBN - http://ibnlive.in.com/news/indian-muslims-welcome-narendra-modis-invitation-to-nawaz-sharif/474161-56.html

    Viewing all 581 articles
    Browse latest View live